Outcome-Oriented and Process-Oriented Frameworks on Biculturalism

Hyun-Hee Heo (1) , Min-Sun Kim (2)
(1) Department of Public Health Sciences John A. Burns School of Medicine University of Hawaii at Manoa , United States
(2) University of Hawaii at Manoa , United States

Abstract

This review attempts to answer the question, “How do individuals develop bicultural identities?” With today’s rapid globalization, not only are individuals increasingly mobile but also possess an unprecedented level of psychological interconnectedness. A growing number of cross-cultural researchers have examined the dynamic aspects of individuals’ cultural identities and the processes of their formation beyond stereotypical frameworks. Over time, acculturation literature has shifted from being outcome-oriented to being process-oriented. Outcome-oriented frameworks rely on in-groups’ judgment toward out-group individuals whereas process-oriented frameworks stress out-group individuals’ cultural identity development through an active process of inquiring, learning, and involvements. The outcome-oriented frameworks consist of the notion of “Marginality” and “Social Identity Theory.” The process-oriented frameworks consist of the model of “Ethnic Identity Formation,” “Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity,” “Cognitive Constructivist Approach”, and “Cultural Hybridization”. “Multidimensional Acculturation Model” is posited as a transitional model between the outcome-oriented framework and the process-oriented framework. Much study has increasingly concentrated on understanding the developmental process of individuals’ cultural identities in various situations, rather than categorizing “this new kind of person” based on dominant cultural groups’ perceptions. As researchers began to focus on how individuals process biculturalism, negative views have been replaced with positive views. Our review ends with implications regarding how and why biculturals behave in specific ways in intercultural communication situations.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Adler, P. S. (1998). Beyond cultural identity: Reflections on multiculturalism. In M. J. Bennett (Ed.), Basic concepts of intercultural communication (pp. 225-245). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press. (Original work published in 1977)

Benet-Martínez, V., Lee, F. & Leu, J. (2006). Biculturalism and cognitive complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 37(4), 386-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106288476

Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., & Morris, M. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology. 33(5), 492-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005005

Bennett, J. M. (1993a). Cultural marginality: Identity issues in intercultural training. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 109–135). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Bennet, M. J. (1993b). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Berry, J.W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. Chun, P. Balls Organista, & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and applied research (pp. 17-37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Assoication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10472-004

Berry, J.W., & Kim, U. (1988). Acculturation and mental health. In P. R. Dasen, J. W. Berry, & N, Sartorius (Eds.), Health and cross-cultural psychology (pp. 207-236). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

Berry, J. W., Phinney, J.S., Sam, D.L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 55(3), 303-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00256.x

Biculturalism. (n.d.). The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&Params=A1ARTA00 00725

Brannen, M. Y., & Thomas, D. C. (2010). Bicultural individuals in organizations. InternationalJournal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(1), 5-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595809359580

Cabinet adopts term ‘bicultural’ for ethnic minorities (2009, January 27). Dutch National News. Retrieved June 23, 2009, from http://crossroadsmag.eu/2009/01/cabinet-adopts-term- bicultural-for-ethnic-minorities/

Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T., & O’Brien, M. A. (2006). Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 262-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.018

Chen, S. X., Benet-Martínez, V., & Bond, M. H. (2008). Bicultural identity, bilingualism, and psychological adjustment in multicultural societies: Immigration-based and globalization-based acculturation. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 803-838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00505.x

Croucher, S. (2004). Globalization and belonging. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

De Korne, H., Byram, M., & Fleming, M. (2007). Familiarizing the stranger: Immigrant perceptions of cross-cultural interaction and bicultural identity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(4), 290 - 307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd462.0

DuBois, W. E. B (1989). The souls of Black folk. New York: Penguin. (Original work published in 1903)

Dwyer, C. (1999). Migrations and diasporas. In P. Cloke, P. Crang, & M. Goodwin (Eds.), Introducing human geographies. London: Arnold Publishers.

Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

Eytan, A. (2004). Globalization and biculturalism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 362-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.184.4.362-a

Fang, T. (2012). Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 25-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00221.x

Goldberg, M. M. (1941). A qualification of the marginal man theory. American Sociological Review, 6, 52-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086343

Green, A. W. (1947). A re-examination of the marginal man concept. Social Forces. 26, 167-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2571773

Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4

Haritatos, J. & Benet-Martínez, V. (2002). Bicultural identities: The interface of cultural, personality, and socio-cognitive processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 598- 606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00510-X

Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111-1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.10.1111

Hong, Y. Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C. Y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.709

Jandt, F. E. (2001). Intercultural communication: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kelly, G. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

Kim, M. S. (2002). Non-Western perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233178

Kim, M. S. (2012). World peace through intercultural research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.11.009

Kim, M. S., Hunter, J. E., Miyahara, A., Horvath, A., Bresnahan, M., & Yoon, H. J. (1996). Individual- vs. culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles. Communication Monograph, 63, 29-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376373

Luna, D., Ringberg, T., & Peracchio, L. (2008). One individual, two identities: Frame switching among biculturals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 279-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/586914

Lutzker, D. (1960). Internationalism as a predictor of cooperative behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4, 426-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276000400404

Matthews, G. (2000). Global culture/Individual identity. London: Routledge.

McDermott, J. & Andrade, N. (2011). People and cultures of Hawai ‘i: The evolution of culture and ethnicity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824835804.001.0001

Moon, S. J., & Park, C. Y. (2007). Media effects on acculturation and biculturalism: A case study of Korean immigrants in Los Angeles’ Korea town. Mass Communication & Society, 10(3), 319-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701407330

Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 5, 881-893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/214592

Phinney, J. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adult: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin. 108(3). 499-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499

Phinney, J., & Devich-Navarro, M. (1997). Variations in bicultural identification among African American and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence 7(1), 3-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0701_2

Phinney, J., Horenczyk, G., Liebkind, K., & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: an interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues. 57(3), 493-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00225

Phinney, J., & Ong, A. D. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of ethnic identity: Current status and future directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 271-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.271

LaFromboise, T., Coleman, H., & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin. 114(3), 395-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.395

Lee, C., & Cochran, L. (1988). Migration problems of Chinese women. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 22, 202-211.

Leung, A., Maddux, W., Galinsky, A., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63(3), 169-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169

Stonequist, E. V. (1935). The problem of the marginal man. The American Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/217001

Sussman, N. M. (2000). The dynamic nature of cultural identity throughout cultural transitions: Why home is not so sweet. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 4(4), 355-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_5

Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Vivero, V. N., & Jenkins, S. R. (1999). Existential hazards of the multicultural individual: Defining and understanding “cultural homelessness”. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 5, 6-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.5.1.6

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Walsh, J. E. (1973). Intercultural education in the community of man. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.

Ward, C. (2004). Psychological theories of culture contact and their implications for intercultural training and interventions. In D. Landis, J. M. Bennett, & M. J. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of Intercultural Training (pp.185-216). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231129.n8

Yamada, A.-M., & Singelis, T. M. (1999). Biculturalism and self-construal. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(5), 697-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00016-4

Authors

Hyun-Hee Heo
hyunheeh@hawaii.edu (Primary Contact)
Min-Sun Kim
Author Biographies

Hyun-Hee Heo, Department of Public Health Sciences John A. Burns School of Medicine University of Hawaii at Manoa

Hyun-Hee Heo is a doctoral student in Department of Public Health Sciences at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Min-Sun Kim, University of Hawaii at Manoa

Min‑Sun Kim is a professor of Communicology at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Heo, H.-H., & Kim, M.-S. (2013). Outcome-Oriented and Process-Oriented Frameworks on Biculturalism. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v13i1.611

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
Views
  • Abstract 102
  • Download PDF 53