Globalised or Glocalized? A comparison of the linguistic features and actor representation of global news headlines in The Sun and Oriental Daily

Kenneth C. C. Kong (1)
(1) Department of English Language and Literature Hong Kong Baptist University , Hong Kong

Abstract

By analyzing a corpus of newspaper headlines collected from the global news in Britain (from The Sun) and Hong Kong (from Oriental Daily) during a two-month period in 2009, this paper aims to identify the relative influence of globalization on the discursive practices of news writing in the two countries/regions. English news headlines, usually configured in short phrases, tend to present events as humorous or dramatic adventures through the deployment of imagined quotations, informal words, and creative sound effects such as rhyme and alliteration, whereas Chinese news headlines make greater use of complete sentences and rarely feature quotations or sound effects. In addition to these different linguistic realizations of headlines, actor representation in British newspapers is also found to be more ‘globalized’ with less focus on ‘others,’ whereas Hong Kong’s Chinese-language newspapers appear to provide greater distance from globalization by positioning international actors as ‘others.’ It is argued here that the use of humorous and adventurous voices in English news and the more frequent representation of global actors as ‘others’ in Chinese news are simply different strategies aimed at achieving the same goal of distancing global actors from the local.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Bell, A. (1991) The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.

Blommaert, J. (2005) Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Translated by G. Raymond & M. Adamson. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chouliaraki, L. (2010) ‘Global representations of distant suffering’. In N. Coupland (ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 608-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068.ch28

Connor, U. (2002) ‘New directions in contrastive rhetoric’. TESOL Quarterly,36(4): 493-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588238

Garret, P. (2010) ‘Meanings of “globalization”: East and West’. In N. Coupland (ed.). The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 447-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324068.ch20

Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994) Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.

Harcup, T. & O’Neil, D. (2001) ‘What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited’. Journalism Studies,2(2): 261-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700118449

Harvey, D. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. & Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333981689_2

House, J. (2003) ‘English as a lingua franca: A threat to multilingualism?’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4): 556-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00242.x

Kong, C. C. Kenneth (1998) ‘Politeness of service encounters in Hong Kong’. Pragmatics,8(4): 555-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.8.4.04kon

Kong, C. C. Kenneth (2006) ‘Evaluative resources in English and Chinese research articles’. Multilingua,24(3): 275-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2005.24.3.275

Lee, M. (2005) ‘Uniqueness of Asian promotion discourse: A contrastive study of Hong Kong bilingual texts and native English texts’. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Gotti (eds.), Asian Business Discourse(s). Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 77-101.

Li, Eden S. H. (2007) A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese. London: Continuum.

Livingston, S. & Bennett, W. L. (2003) ‘Gatekeeping, indexing, and live-event news: Is technology altering the construction of news?’ Political Communication,20: 363-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244121

Livingston, S. & van Belle, A. (2005) ‘The effect of satellite technology on newsgathering’.Political Communication,22: 45-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590908438

Machin, D. & van Leeuwen, T. (2003) Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Abington, UK: Routledge.

Pan, Z., Lee, C.-C., Chan, J. M. & So, C. Y. K. (1999) ‘One event, three stories: Media narratives of the handover of Hong Kong in cultural China’. International Communication Gazette,61(2): 99-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549299061002001

Peng, M. (2006) ‘Comparison between Chinese and English headlines and the translation from English headlines to Chinese headlines’. Cross-cultural Communication, 1(2): 69-72.

Richardson, J. E. (2007) Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8_7

Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2001) Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

Scollon, R., Scollon, S. & Kirkpatrick, A. (2000) Contrastive Discourse in Chinese and English: A Critical Appraisal. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Silverstein, M. & Urban, G. (1996) ‘The natural history of discourse’. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (eds.), Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 1-17.

Sun, H. (2011) ‘Customer-employee interaction from a diachronic perspective’. In P. Yuling & D. Z. Kádár (eds.), Chinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice. London: Equinox, publication details pending.

Swales, J. (2004) Research Genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827

Tannen, D. (2007) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987

Taylor, G. & Chen, T. (1991) ‘Linguistic, cultural and sub-cultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts’. Applied Linguistics, 12(3): 319-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.3.319

Thurlow, C. & Jaworski, A. (2010) Tourism Discourse: Language and Global Mobility. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

Ungerer, F. (2000) English Media Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Upton, T.A. & Connor, U. (2001) ‘Using computerized corpus analysis to the investigate textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre’. English for Specific Purposes,20: 313-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00022-3

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors’. In C. R. Caldas & M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 32-70.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2009) ‘Critical discourse analysis’. In J. Renkema (ed.), Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 277-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.148.27lee

Wu, D. & Ng, P. (2011) ‘Becoming global, remaining local: The discourses of international news reporting by CCTV-4 and Phoenix TV Hong Kong’. Critical Arts: A Journal of South-North Cultural and Media Studies, 25(1):73-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2011.552211

Authors

Kenneth C. C. Kong
kkong@hkbu.eud.hk (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Kenneth C. C. Kong, Department of English Language and Literature Hong Kong Baptist University

Kenneth C. C. Kong is teaching and researching discourse analysis, multimodal analysis and intercultural communication at the English Department of Hong Kong Baptist University. He has published extensively in those areas and is currently working on two book projects, one is on professional discourse and the other on history of professions in China and the West and their influence on our personal identities.

Kong, K. C. C. (2012). Globalised or Glocalized? A comparison of the linguistic features and actor representation of global news headlines in The Sun and Oriental Daily. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 12(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v12i3.604

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
Views
  • Abstract 74
  • Download PDF 51