Intertextual borrowings in ideologically competing discourses:The case of the Middle East

Kawakib Momani (1) , Muhammad A. Badarneh (2) , Fathi Migdadi (3)
(1) , Jordan
(2) Jordan University of Science & Technology , Jordan
(3) Jordan University of Science & Technology , Jordan

Abstract

This study examines ideologically driven intertextual borrowings in political discourse in light of political events related to the Middle East. Its primary concern is to explore the ideological struggle and power relations governing the production of political text. For this purpose, this study analyses a variety of texts on the Middle East in both Arabic and English. These texts are analyzed through a multi-dimensional approach of Critical Discourse Analysis. It is argued that what sometimes seems to be an innocent and neutral historical reference, including quotations, hides much more dynamism and involvement that is not less ideologically driven than directly stated stances.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Acocella, J. (2004). Holy smoke: What were the crusades really about? http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/articles/041213crbo_books?041213crbo_books

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Carroll, J. (2004). Crusade: Chronicles of an unjust war. New York: Metropolitan Books.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218

Chouliaraki, L., Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. London: Taylor and Francis.

CNN (2001). Bin Laden calls 9/11 attacks 'blessed terror'. December 27, CNN.com

Culler, J. (1981). The pursuit of the sign. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

Dawkins, R. (2003). Bin Laden's victory. The Guardian, March 22.

Derbyshire, J. (2001). Crusade. http://www.olimu.com/Journalism/Texts/Commentary/Crusades.html

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3 (2), 193-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4 (2), 133-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.

Gadavanij, S. (2002). Intertextuality as discourse strategy: The case of no-confidence debates in Thailand. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 35-55.

Gilkes, C. (2003). Pandora's Box, war and terror: Bush, religion and Eurocentric geo-politics. Retrieved March 18. http://www.trinicenter.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=266

Gwynne, R. (2001). A political system that delivers this disastrous mistake needs reform. Department of Religious Studies, University of Tennessee. Accessed September 18. http://web.utk.edu/~warda/bin_ladin_and_quran.htm

Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written text analysis. London: Routledge.

Kristeva, J. (1986). The Kristeva reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

Linell, P. (2001). Dynamics of discourse or stability of structure: Sociolinguistics and the legacy from linguistics. London: Longman.

MacLeod, S. (2001). Understanding Bin Laden's hot buttons. http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,178971,00.html (accessed October 10).

McGrath, D. (2001). Gendered language of war. http://www.gwu.edu/~medusa/language.html (accessed February 25, 2007).

Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin.

Remarks by the President upon arrival. September 16, 2001. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010916-2.html

Rojo, L. M. (1993). Division and rejection from personification of the Gulf conflict to the demonization of Saddam Hussein. Discourse & Society, 5 (1), 49-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001004

Scheer, R. (2004). With God on his side: By invoking a higher power, Bush sidesteps pesky constitutional issues. Los Angeles Times, April 20.

The Guardian. 2001. Bin Laden's statement translation supplied by the Associated Press. October 7. http://www.guardian.co.uk

The Guardian. 2001. Bin Laden rails against Arab 'infidels' and the UN Staff and agencies. November 3. http://www.guardian.co.uk

The Guardian. 2002. Bin Laden's sole post-September 11 TV interview aired: Fugitive al- Qaeda leader vows fight to death. February 5. http://www.guardian.co.uk

Tincq, H. (2003). The clash of two fundamentalisms. March 31. http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/040403G.shtml

van Dijk, T. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6 (2), 243-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006

van Dijk, T. (2003). Ideology and discourse: a multidisciplinary introduction. http://www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Ideology%20and%20discourse.pdf (accessed February 5, 2009)

van Dijk, T. (2005). War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics, 4 (1), 65-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij

Widlanski, M. (2005). FrontPageMagazine.com. June 20. http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18475

Wodak, R. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020

Authors

Kawakib Momani
kmomani@just.edu.jo (Primary Contact)
Muhammad A. Badarneh
Fathi Migdadi
Author Biographies

Kawakib Momani

Kawakib Momani is assistant professors in the Department of English at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan. The first author teaches courses in discourse analysis and English for Specific Purposes (ESP). Her research interests include semiotics, political discourse, and bilingualism.

Muhammad A. Badarneh, Jordan University of Science & Technology

Muhammad A. Badarneh is teaches courses in pragmatics, stylistics, and ESP. His research interests include pragmatics, stylistics, translation, and rhetoric.

Fathi Migdadi, Jordan University of Science & Technology

Fathi Migdadi teaches courses in general linguistics. His research interests include pragmatics, conversation analysis, and bilingualism.

Momani, K., Badarneh, M. A., & Migdadi, F. (2010). Intertextual borrowings in ideologically competing discourses:The case of the Middle East. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 10(1), 1‚Äď13. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v10i1.497

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
Views
  • Abstract 90
  • Download PDF 56