The Hegemonic Role of the United States in the U.S.-China Copyright Disputes

Dexin Tian (1)
(1) Department of Liberal Arts, SCAD-Hong Kon , Hong Kong


This paper examines the U.S. hegemonic role in imposing its copyright standards onto the Chinese, who hold fundamentally different cultural perceptions of copyright in terms of innovation, fair use, and the public domain. A thematic analysis of the transcripts of 45 in-depth interviews of the Chinese copyright holders and consumers via the theoretical lens of hegemony reveals the following. To obtain bigger market access and better protection of its intellectual property rights (IPR), the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has been coercive in universalizing its IPR standards and policies by establishing an internal interagency mechanism and an external network. The study suggests that both the United States and China need to adopt the golden mean to realize the goals of its respective copyright laws.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Babbie, E. (2002). The basics of social research, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Beeson, M., & Higgott, R. (2005). Hegemony, institutionalism and U.S. foreign policy: Theory and practice in comparative historical perspective. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1173-1188. DOI:

Braun, V., & Clarke,V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77. DOI:

Cherniack, S. (1994). Book culture and textual transmission in Sung China. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 54(1), 5-125. DOI:

Cohen, M. A. (1997). Protecting the intangible: Intellectual property issues in Sino-Foreign ventures. Retrieved February 12, 2008, from

Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, state and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium, 10(2), 126-155. DOI:

Croix, S. J. L., & Konan, D. E. (2002). Intellectual property rights in China: The changing political economy of Chinese-American interests. The World Economy, 25, 759-786. DOI:

GAO. (2008). USTR’s China’s compliance reports and plans could be improved. Retrieved July 5, 2008, from

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Halbert, D. (2005). Globalized resistance to intellectual property. Retrieved April 24, 2007, from

IIPA special 301 Report. (2001, 2003, 2008). Retrieved June 28, 2008, from

Kluckhohn, C. K. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons and E.A. Shills’ (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action, New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952) Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions. Peabody Museum, Cambridge, MA.

Lehman, J. A. (2006). Intellectual property rights and Chinese tradition section: Philosophical foundation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(1), 1-9. DOI:

Leininger, M. M. (1985). Ethnography and ethno-nursing: Models and modes of qualitative data analysis. In M. M. Leininger (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.

Lessig, L. (2004). Free Culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.

Li, J. & Li, S. (May 22, 2007). The U.S.-China trade deficit, debunked. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 3, 2008, from

Liao, J. C. (2006). China’s response to the global IPR regime: Compliance or resistance? Issues & Studies, 42(4), 175-222.

Lindlof, T. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lu, J., & Weber, I. (2008). Chinese government and software copyright: Manipulating the boundaries between public and private. International Journal of Communication, 2, 81-99.

Nasheri, H. (2005). Addressing the global scope of intellectual property crimes and policy initiatives. Trends in Organized Crime, 8(4), 79–108. DOI:

Neigel, C. (2000). Piracy in Russia and China: A different U.S. reaction. Law and Contemporary Problems, 63(4), 179-199. DOI:

Office of the USTR. (2008). History of the United States Trade Representative. Retrieved August 20, 2008, from

Peng, X. H. (1999). Copyright protection of computer software in the People’s Republic of China: Conforming to international practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Shao, K. (2006). What may validate intellectual property in the traditional Chinese mind? Examining the U.S.-China IP disputes through a historical inquiry. Journal of Information, Law & Technology, 1, 1-22.

Siwek, S. E. (2007). The true cost of copyright industry piracy to the U.S. economy. Institute for Policy Innovation Policy Report #189, 1-22.

Steidlmeier, P. (1993). The moral legitimacy of intellectual property claims: American business and developing country perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 157-164. DOI:

Strinati, D. (1995). An Introduction to Theories of Popular Culture. London: Routledge.

Swanson, K. C. (2005). The copyright challenge in China. CNET News. Com. Retrieved September 28, 2005, from

Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1989). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

USTR special 301 report (2000-2008). Retrieved June 26, 2008, from

USTR special 301 report. (2005). Retrieved March 23, 2007, from http://www.the

Wingrove, N. (1995). China traditions oppose war on IP piracy. Research-Technology Management, 38(3), 6-7.

Xinhua. (2007, March 16). Top legislature adopts landmark property law. China-View. Retrieved March 20, 2009, from XinhuaNet. (2006, Sept. 6). China’s copyright protection. Retrieved June 26, 2008, from

Xue, H. (2005). Between the hammer and the block: China’s intellectual property rights in the network age. University of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, 2(2), 291-314.

Yatsko, P. (2000). Knocking out and knockoffs. Fortune Magazine, Oct. 2, p. 213.

Yu, P. K. (2001). From pirates to partners: Protecting intellectual property in China in the twenty-first century. American University Law Review, 50, 131-243. DOI:

Yuan, G. (2001). A comparison of cyberspace copyright protection in China and the United States. Cyberspace Law Seminar, 1-40.


Dexin Tian  (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Dexin Tian, Department of Liberal Arts, SCAD-Hong Kon

Dr. Dexin Tian is Professor of Liberal Arts, School of Liberal Arts, SCAD-Hong Kong. His teaching and research interests lie in Intercultural and Organizational Communication as well as Intellectual Property Rights from the cultural perspective.

Tian, D. (2010). The Hegemonic Role of the United States in the U.S.-China Copyright Disputes. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 10(2), 1–11.

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
  • Abstract 84
  • Download PDF 52