Research into Intercultural Communicative Competence: A Model Test

Ali Asghar Ghasemi (1) , Mosa Ahmadian (2)
(1) Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Arak University, Iran , Iran, Islamic Republic of
(2) Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Arak University, Iran , Iran, Islamic Republic of


This study intended to propose a model of intercultural communicative competence integrating international posture, L2 motivational self-system, autonomy, and cognitive learning strategies. To do so, 180 EFL learners in the Iranian EFL context, selected by convenience sampling procedure, participated in the study. The findings, derived from structural equation modeling, showed that the model adequately fits to the data. That was discussed that interest in seeking international affairs and making intercultural friends, desire to bridge the gap between their current and future selves, taking responsibility for learning, and employment of deep/surface learning strategies direct learners to open conversation with the speakers of other ethnicities. Finally, implications for language teachers and policymakers to inspiring learners to be competent in intercultural communication were provided.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Alhusban, H. A., & Alshehri, N. (2022). “Wallah! I Beg Your Pardon...”: A Cross-cultural Study of Apology Speech Acts. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22(1), 69 - 80.

Ahmad, I., Thurasamy, R., Shahzad, A., Ullah, M. I., Hussain, A., & Ansari, H. W. A. (2023). COVID-19 impact on dairy sector: The mediating role of knowledge sharing and trust on innovation capability. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 26(1), 1-11.

American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: Author.

Arasaratnam, L. A. (2006). Further testing of a new model of intercultural communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 23(2): 93-99.

Arasaratnam, L.A., Banerjee, S.C., & Dembek, K. (2011). The integrated model of intercultural communication competence (IMICC): Model test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Singapore.

Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1): 74-94.

Bennett, J., Bennett, M., & Allen, W. (2003). Developing intercultural competence in the language classroom. In D. Lange & R. Paige (Eds.), Culture as the core: Perspectives on culture in second language learning (pp. 237-270). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman.

Breen, M. P. & Mann, S. J. (1997). Shooting arrows at the sun: perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 133-149). Harlow: Longman.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. New York, NY: Multilingual Matters.

Byram, M. (2000). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. London: Routledge.

Carballal-Broome, A., & Pinillos, M.-J. (2022). International career aspirations: Can multicultural personality traits predict the interest in working abroad? Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22(2), 11-21.

Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98-119). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 24(4): 24-34.

Dam, L. (1995). From Theory to Classroom Practice. Dublin: Authentik.

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in Intercultural Education, 10(3): 241-266.

Diseth, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientation and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 191-195.

Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40(1): 45-78.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1): 59-109.

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitude and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.

Ghasemi, A. A., & Dowlatabadi, H. R. (2018). Investigating the Role of Task Value, Surface/Deep Learning Strategies, and Higher Order Thinking in Predicting Self-regulation and Language Achievement. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(3): 664-681.

Ghasemi, A. A., Ahmadian, M., Yazdani, H., & Amerian, M. (2020). Towards a Model of Intercultural Communicative Competence in Iranian EFL Context: Testing the Role of International Posture, Ideal L2 Self, L2 Self-Confidence, and Metacognitive Strategies. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49(1), 41-60.

Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Asadpour, S. F. (2012). Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non-English major university students. Journal of language and Social Psychology, 31(2): 197-211.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2): 139-151.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.

Holec, H. (1979). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Huang, H. T., Hsu, C. C., & Chen, S. W. (2015). Identification with social role obligations, possible selves, and L2 motivation in foreign language learning. System, 51, 28-38.

Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least square (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2): 195-204.<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7

Islam, M., Lamb, M., & Chambers, G. (2013). The L2 motivational self system and national interest: A Pakistani perspective. System, 41(2): 231-244.

Klimas, A. (2017). A goal-setting logbook as an instrument fostering learner autonomy. In M. Pawlak, A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak & J. Bielak, Autonomy in Second Language Learning: Managing the Resources (pp. 21-33). Cham: Springer.

Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2014). The Interaction of Motivation, Self‐Regulatory Strategies, and Autonomous Learning Behavior in Different Learner Groups. Tesol Quarterly, 48(2): 275-299.

León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156-163.

Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1): 71-94.

Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9): 954-69.

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning - I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(), 4-11.

Meyer, M. (1991). Developing transcultural competence: Case studies of advanced language learners. In D. Buttjes & M. Byram (Eds.), Mediating languages and cultures: Towards an intercultural theory of foreign language education (pp. 136-158). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Mirzaei, A., & Forouzandeh, F. (2013). Relationship between intercultural communicative competence and L2-learning motivation of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(3): 300-318.

Mojoudi, A., & Tabatabaei, O. (2014). The relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and autonomy among Iranian intermediate and upper intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(6): 22-28.

Munezane, Y. (2013). Attitudes, affect and ideal L2 self as predictors of willingness to communicate. EUROSLA Yearbook, 13(1): 176-198.

Murphy, S.M., & Tyler, S. (2005). The relationship between learning approaches to part-time study of management courses and transfer of learning to the workplace. Educational Psychology, 25(5): 455-469.

Öz, H. (2014). Ideal L2 self as a predictor of intercultural communicative competence. The Anthropologist, 19(1): 41-53.

Öz, H., Demirezen, M., & Pourfeiz, J. (2015). Willingness to communicate of EFL learners in Turkish context. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 269-275.

Papi, M. (2010). The L2 motivational self system, L2 anxiety, and motivated behavior: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 38, 467-479.

Peng, J. E. (2015). L2 motivational self system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: An imagined community perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2): 433-443.

Phan, H.P., & Deo, B. (2007). The revised learning process questionnaire: A validation of a Western model of students' study approaches to the South Pacific context using confirmatory factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 719-739.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1995). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, The University of Michigan.

Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 265-286). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sankaran, S. R., & Bui, T. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on performance: a study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 28(3): 191-198.

Sercu L., Garcia, M. and Prieto, P. C. (2004). Culture teaching in foreign language education: EFL teachers in Spain as cultural mediators. Porta Linguarium 1, 85-102.

Sobkowiak, P. (2017). Developing Learners' Intercultural Competence through Autonomous Learning. In M. Pawlak, A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak & J. Bielak, Autonomy in Second Language Learning: Managing the Resources (pp. 51-60). Cham: Springer.

Teimouri, Y. (2017). L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4): 681-709.

Ueki, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2013). Forming a clearer image of the ideal L2 self: The L2 Motivational Self System and learner autonomy in a Japanese EFL context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3): 238-252.

Varasteh, H., Ghanizadeh, A., & Akbari, O. (2016). The role of task value, effort-regulation, and ambiguity tolerance in predicting EFL learners' test anxiety, learning strategies, and language achievement. Psychological Studies, 61(1): 2-12.

Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York, NY: Macmillan

Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33, 177-195.

Wiseman, R. L. (2002). Intercultural communication competence. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (2nd ed.) (pp. 207-224). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Wolters, C. (2004). Advancing goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(), 236-250.

Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1): 54-66.

Yashima, T., & Zenuk-Nishide, L. (2008). The impact of learning contexts on proficiency, attitudes, and L2 communication: Creating an imagined international community. System, 36(4): 566-585.


Ali Asghar Ghasemi (Primary Contact)
Mosa Ahmadian
Author Biographies

Ali Asghar Ghasemi, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Arak University, Iran

Ali Asghar Ghasemi is currently a PhD candidate in the Department of English Language and Literature Arak University, Iran. His fields of interest are Psycholinguistics, Individual Differences in SLA, and Language Testing

Mosa Ahmadian, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Arak University, Iran

Mosa Ahmadian is currently an associate professor in the Department of English Language and Literature Arak University, Iran. His fields of interest are Psycholinguistics and Instructed SLA, TEFL, Critical Discourse Analysis, Translation Studies, and Literature, on which he has published and presented many papers in (inter)national journals and conferences. He runs courses on translation, English Literature, and Applied Linguistics for BA and MA students and courses on Psycholinguistics, FLA, and SLA studies for PhD candidates. He has carried out a number of research projects on Translatology, Textology and Intertextuality. He has supervised a great number of MA and PhD theses relating to his fields of study.

Ghasemi, A. A., & Ahmadian, M. (2023). Research into Intercultural Communicative Competence: A Model Test. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 75–87.

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
  • Abstract 171212
  • PDF 412
  • XML 0