<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Delivering A Good Speech by Identifying the Interpersonal Meaning Found in Joe Biden’s Victory Speech: A Case on Systemic Functional Linguistics</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Herman</surname>
            <given-names>Herman</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>herman@uhn.ac.id</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Saputra</surname>
            <given-names>Nanda</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>nandasaputra680@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Ngongo</surname>
            <given-names>Magdalena</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>magdalenangongo12@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <surname>Fatmawati</surname>
            <given-names>Endang</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>endangfatmawati@live.undip.ac.id</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">
        <institution>Department of English Education, Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar, Pematang Siantar, Indonesia</institution>
        <country>Indonesia</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff-2">
        <institution>STIT Al-Hilal Sigli, 10 Perniagaan, 24 114, Aceh, Indonesia</institution>
        <country>Indonesia</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff-3">
        <institution>Department of English Education, Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana in Kupang, Indonesia</institution>
        <country>Indonesia</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff-4">
        <institution>Department of Information and Public Relations, Universitas Diponegoro in Semarang, Indonesia</institution>
        <country>Indonesia</country>
      </aff>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-09-02">
          <day>02</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
      </history>
    <pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2022</year><volume>22</volume></pub-date></article-meta>
  </front>
  
  
<body id="body">
    <sec id="heading-94498b9abfd384fc7ca32d0762036252">
      <title>
        <bold id="bold-6">1. Introduction</bold>
      </title>
      <p id="paragraph-2"> Speech is one instrument used to express emotions, opinions, and ideas. Speech is a speaker’s act of expressing ideas, messages, and emotions to listeners. In other words, Speech is a speaking activity to express emotions, opinions, ideas, and information, as well as entertain listeners and is usually performed to deliver speeches in front of the public (Firmansyah et al., 2019). Speech is an important way to reach a speaker’s goals, such as delivering messages, persuading people, and influencing audiences (Jin and Lu, 2013). Thus, a speaker must sustainably interact with others by carefully selecting acceptable sentences and vocabularies related to systemic functional linguistics (SFL). According to Herman, Sulistyani, Ngongo, Fatmawati, and Saputra (2022), Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is defined as a study of language in the process of making meaning or a study of language function (Susanto and Watik, 2017). Boccia (2021) defined Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) as a language theory centred on the concept of language function. In other words, Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is the study of language function to make meaning. Halliday &amp; Matthiessen (2014) state that there are three meta-function types in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL): ideational meaning, textual meaning, and interpersonal meaning (Purba et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="paragraph-3">Xiang (2022) clarify that interpersonal meaning refers to language as a tool to interact with people. Interpersonal meaning considers language as a tool to interact with other people (Halliday, 1994; Darong, 2021). Interpersonal is an intriguing phenomenon to study because understanding interpersonal meaning can help people succeed in exchanging information, goods, and services with listeners (Dalton-Puffer, 2005). It is due to its function, which can provide guidance on how to select appropriate grammatical choices in communication (social interaction). It is critical to employ good grammatical choices in communication because they can create various and meaningful expressions influencing the relationship between a speaker and audience within the communication. According to Hulu (2019), Interpersonal meaning is an intriguing topic to discuss because interpersonal meaning may help people succeed in delivering information, goods, and services to listeners by providing ideas on how makes the right grammatical choices in communication (Chefor, 2019). Thus, the researchers were interested in investigating interpersonal meaning frequently utilized in speech and represented, for example, by Joe Biden. In conducting this research, the researchers have provided previous research from a thesis related to interpersonal meaning as a theory. The research was written by (Marhamah, 2014) from Yogyakarta State University, entitled “Interpersonal Meaning Analysis on Muse’s </p>
      <p id="paragraph-4">Song Lyrics found in Black Holes and Revelations Albums”. The research aimed to characterize kinds of mood and modes of interpersonal meaning realized in the Muse’s Song lyrics found in Black Holes and Revelations albums. Halliday's hypothesis was applied by the researchers. Mood and Residue are the interpersonal meaning components (Ping and Lingling, 2017). The Mood elements consisting of Subject and Finite show the clauses’ interpersonal functions. Meanwhile, the other component is known as Residue.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-5">However, this research has similarities and differences with the previous research. Both focused on mood structures., Yet, the researchers also focused on speech function and mood structures using Gerrot and Wignell's theory. Thus, the novelty of this research is shown and important to be conducted. This research can be a good reference for speakers to deliver a good speech since using functional linguistics, especially interpersonal meaning.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-e43789f4a801b9c8907cc6051aadb14b">
      <title>
        <bold id="bold-7">2. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-8">Research Methodology</bold>
      </title>
      <p id="paragraph-7">A descriptive-qualitative method was employed by the researchers in this study. According to Munthe <italic id="italic-2">et al.</italic> (2021), the descriptive technique consists of gathering, categorizing, evaluating, and interpreting the data, eventually followed by a conclusion drawing without making generalizations (Silalahi <italic id="italic-3">et al.</italic>, 2022). The researchers employed descriptive-qualitative research since the researchers collected and analyzed the data and then drew the conclusion. The researchers employed a document or content analysis because the research subject was Joe Biden's speech script. Document or content analysis, according to Herman, Shara, Silalahi, Sherly, and Julyanthry (2022), is a research method used to detect certain characteristics of written or visual resources. Public records, textbooks, newspapers, letters, videos, diaries, topics, reports, or other documents may be used. </p>
      <p id="paragraph-8">
        <bold id="bold-9">2.1. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-10">Research Data Source </bold>
      </p>
      <p id="paragraph-9">The researchers had to identify the data source relevant to the research problem. In this study, the researchers used the data from a Google website (https://www.washingtonpost.com) containing Joe Biden's Victory Speech on November 7, 2020, at 9:56 p.m. EST. The researchers chose this issue because Joe Biden was recently elected as the President of the United States, according to the most recent election results.<bold id="bold-11"/></p>
      <p id="paragraph-10">
        <bold id="bold-12">2.2. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-13">Data Collection Technique</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="paragraph-11">In this study, the researchers used qualitative data. According to Feng and Liu (2010), data collection processes included identifying the research limits, collecting information through unstructured or semi-structured observations and interviews, documents, and visual materials, as well as establishing a strategy to record the information.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-12">There are numerous data-gathering methods, including documents, observations, tests, interviews, and surveys. The documentation technique was used by the researchers to gather the data. According to Ezeifeka (2013), documentation is a technique used to gather data based on documents, including transcripts, books, newspapers, magazines, and others. In this study, the researchers obtained the data from the transcript. The documentation method was used for data gathering. As a result, the researchers employed the documentation method by reading, analyzing the text, and then collecting the data.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-13">Opening the webpage www.washingtonpost.com.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-14">Searching the topic of Joe Biden's Victory Speech from the website of Washington Post Newspaper.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-15">Copying the article of Joe Biden's Victory Speech from the website of Washington Post Newspaper.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-16">
        <bold id="bold-14">2.3. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-15">Data Analysis Technique</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="paragraph-17">After the data was collected, the researchers then analyzed the data. Herman, van Thao and Purba (2021) defined that data analysis allows the researchers to put the research hypothesis to the test or answer the research question. Hence, data analysis contains four components: data collecting, data condensation, data displays, and conclusion drawing. </p>
      <p id="paragraph-18">
        <bold id="bold-16">2.4. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-17">Data Collection</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="paragraph-19">The researchers used Joe Biden's Victory speech in this study. The researchers also tried to obtain materials and references from other books related to the topic under study. </p>
      <p id="paragraph-20">
        <bold id="bold-18">2.5. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-19">Data Condensation</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="paragraph-21">Data condensation is an act of selecting, limiting, simplifying, and changing the raw data from the written-up field notes, so the researchers limited the interpersonal meaning analysis by focusing on mood structures and speech functions found in the clauses. Speech function is a technique used by someone to express ideas in communication for listeners to fully comprehend the concepts. When exchanging and expressing ideas, humans play two roles: giving and requesting commodities, such as information, goods, or services. The speech function is separated into four types: statement, question, command, and offer. The researchers examined the interpersonal meaning in Joe Biden's Victory speech by deeply exploring the Mood Structure of clauses found in the speech. Thus, the speech was separated into clauses (clause-complex), and then each clause was interpersonally evaluated. </p>
      <p id="paragraph-22">
        <bold id="bold-20">2.6. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-21">Data Display</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="paragraph-23">The researchers went beyond the data by offering certain clauses from Joe Biden's Victory speech as the representation to describe the explanation related to the analysis of mood structures and speech functions. The researchers also conducted an overall investigation of mood structures and speech functions in tables. There are two types of tables: mood structures analysis and speech functions with mood types analysis tables. </p>
      <p id="paragraph-24">
        <bold id="bold-22">2.7. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-23">Conclusion Drawing</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="paragraph-25">In this research, the researchers drew some conclusions based on the analysis results by making some explanations.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-8441644400704676cb158a1a2a2820a3">
      <title>
        <bold id="bold-24">3. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-25">Findings </bold>
      </title>
      <p id="paragraph-27">This research focused on the interpersonal meaning of systemic functional linguistics found in 50 clauses taken from Joe Biden’s victory speech. In this case, the researchers presented 10 clauses as the corpus data.<bold id="bold-2"/></p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl1">
        <label>Table 1</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="bold-48de7b6de8a51f541db4e77cc0e827db">(</bold>Clause 1) My fellow Americans and the people who brought me to the dance, Delawareans.<bold id="bold-c7b8f78cc88709823bbfd68fe464afd8"/></title>
          <p id="_paragraph-28"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-1">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-a9a4a66b869a129295c68ba72e4598d4">
              <td id="add33f9efacc122e9bd03c9b83ef37db">My fellow Americans and the people who</td>
              <td id="c089b4e3b6aa888300ef985c75817107">Did</td>
              <td id="04f519063f821fa805219cdadbefd049">Bring</td>
              <td id="c1ea2a2b7ed74f06bcc5ec15d441c8c1">Me to the dance, Delawareans.</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-5d4b1dce9820d32a965a135a650c2b89">
              <td id="7bb7a21a2a4ce4ab3ca7fee1c321d3fe">Subject</td>
              <td id="383ab0a792e891898b4b57105c4bed78">Finite</td>
              <td id="6b4225118bece8b02e26bb2d8bdc7480">Predicator</td>
              <td id="4638e3893a3c6a28a3e3ca6835a5aff5">Complement</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-35f988efa540115d125b475fc3d50067">
              <td id="a1ce1162f74e7463e73f3e5c21fec574" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="32ac3740cd4a79d78e8eddba481f4271" colspan="2">Residue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-e50470e2ad0497fee9e1267aae14c708">
              <td id="d6f3bbf5c8a03866aab93459576427a1" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-1">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="801ee3d4fd64ff789abd6edf7da0c743" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-2">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-da283431cf0ac168f9a7475047064728">
              <td id="f8f950cb1cabf61d52694d395b339197" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-3">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="cb0153de7a10f83fa3d190d33db6e935" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-4">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-29">From the clause above, <italic id="_italic-5">My</italic><italic id="_italic-6"> fellow Americans and the people</italic>were the Subjects of the clause. <italic id="_italic-7">My fellow Americans and the people</italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and <italic id="_italic-8">did</italic> as the Finite because the researchers split the verbal operator from the Predicators (the finite element is always fused with the other element, known as Predicator, <italic id="_italic-9">brought</italic> from <italic id="_italic-10">did</italic> + <italic id="_italic-11">bring</italic>), and <italic id="_italic-12">Me to the dance, Delawareans </italic>as the complement. The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl2">
        <label>Table 2</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="bold-1">(</bold>Clause 2) I see my buddy Tom, Senator Tom Carper, down there</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-31"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-2">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-24bf670671349ddeaeb12d92066abe49">
              <td id="143c4333b79123d886dc812065df2bbe">I </td>
              <td id="214ed11020143188720cfc47bc8719da">Do</td>
              <td id="db97fa1d587cd27faa33ed6211c806b7">See</td>
              <td id="6b8c5e430b6094718524cf8fb17a0ce5">My buddy Tom, senator Tom Carper</td>
              <td id="84b264b0378803401c52c367602236ce">down there</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-f89315598a2529bc81c4915dd90f187d">
              <td id="268bb06ab02b2a63c5d19b1be8000fbc">Subject</td>
              <td id="d120aa397333fa02ba9cb26b1e83efc5">finite</td>
              <td id="257bf7733857673d5b952a2812c39969">predicator</td>
              <td id="b8d9509d0cb9ad77a8409882686b528d">Complement</td>
              <td id="e5289c30a4c049d8e161938091b82f06">Cir. Adjunct</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-ab0cbb6cda441c4b54835dffb3a7348d">
              <td id="6c94c5c1fa54da04621a49ef7b402089" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="03fbc09936bc6cc94fbfcb762d86e567" colspan="3">Residue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-9f772ad722b770ef9c005e5435d03a0d">
              <td id="41f4eba924a3a43a7bf8ee323bd582fc" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-13">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="4154cfdbb17497e5fb0079e12a116559" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-14">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-55e1c20598f9ab012c219b21191359c0">
              <td id="2c10e06f786ecf3a3ab85724ce5a4a27" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-15">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="a7617fbeacd9fcf4331ba00b30d664de" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-16">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-32">From the clause above, <italic id="_italic-17">I </italic>was the Subject of the clause. <italic id="_italic-18">I </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and <italic id="_italic-19">do</italic> as the Finite because the researchers split the verbal operator from the Predicators (the finite element is always fused with the other element, known as Predicator, <italic id="_italic-20">see</italic> is from <italic id="_italic-21">do</italic> + <italic id="_italic-22">see</italic>), <italic id="_italic-23">My buddy Tom, senator Tom Carper</italic> as the complement, and <italic id="_italic-24">down there </italic>as Circumstance adjunct. The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl3">
        <label>Table 3</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-9">Clause 3</bold><bold id="_bold-10">: </bold>And I think,</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-34"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-3">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-69cb4535b5c72b453de227e7bdd86fe6">
              <td id="adaf06d8e59cb64804a5905659d3a589">And</td>
              <td id="714d9eea836dfb532021d538465fa998">I</td>
              <td id="a8504525127be32e67af79dfa0c72375" colspan="2">do </td>
              <td id="d85303faf9f28d208f59d6f884006be9">Think</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-2330206e316649e24b361cd17428db98">
              <td id="ec323e88810ecb2ef5dee58693f1a5cc">Con. Adjunct</td>
              <td id="aafceb4b604b1de9248af056d55b680c">subject</td>
              <td id="e3afa04e5c998c6de0a82a8c6667c471" colspan="2">Finite</td>
              <td id="c4a49cb20fcd6ed157100945886bf882">Predicator</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-17b2463d527e2ed5468c4ffbc3c70488">
              <td id="edb3f7443b53d629f83478434ee40eb6">Re-</td>
              <td id="c3e5b88980db7050367b65e4bae083a1" colspan="3">Mood</td>
              <td id="4885def69fb1daaf2b9af089f3051d7e">-sidue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-150bdf4f98c7e2923b01451b1ad8b864">
              <td id="fb4871a8d185a5b16a2d94d290cef745" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-25">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="831f59d4fe0cf308f2318e699544a9b9" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-26">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-eea2f34804c1ac58a7db530e93cf5792">
              <td id="087add0b7ee8448fe5e10b64f3d592b8" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-27">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="2e5bc7e05ba5b88ae0312ce72ed30b77" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-28">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-35">The clause above wasa conjunctive adjunct because (<italic id="_italic-29">And</italic>) was the cohesive conjunction and categorized as a Conjunctive Adjunct to provide linking relations between one sentence and the others (linking sentences), <italic id="_italic-30">I </italic>was as the Subject of the clause. <italic id="_italic-31">I </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun, and <italic id="_italic-32">do</italic> was as the Finite because the researchers split the verbal operator from the Predicators (the finite element is always fused with the other element, known as Predicator, <italic id="_italic-33">think</italic> is from <italic id="_italic-34">do</italic> + <italic id="_italic-35">think</italic>). The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl4">
        <label>Table 4</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-11">Clause 4</bold><bold id="_bold-12">: </bold>I think Senator Coons is there.</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-37"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-4">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-4c5576497364fe67fc572fd665fa5fdf">
              <td id="7a69012af41eb896407222b2cf1f7482">I </td>
              <td id="53c9c1d67b58e8997951604ef9dce399">Do</td>
              <td id="585dc21b1ee3d50d25cb6e040bd9ef52">Think</td>
              <td id="4989c5e610281e71b19e6e67a3a1c82d">Senator coons</td>
              <td id="3c1befaf444bfedfd8f5740489076eae">is there</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-8aaac2814c66f6af4b807fc69e45e47e">
              <td id="61831e3b6738072ee6d6dbb346a43c60">Subject</td>
              <td id="2d105bcd0e7278b73fc6f39815dda3a4">finite</td>
              <td id="091b2f14b45b72287327fb959b99ac7a">predicator</td>
              <td id="15b4e22f1cb5569327e2e312b9f1e82d">Complement</td>
              <td id="cb4816a0f1e190c9e2fcb7985d2d7cf4">Cir. Adjunct</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-04b26b3f3f66784076cecd7680180450">
              <td id="d17e65f6ff4c400a8354f024de8ceaf8" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="e1146debc78c2f5a493aabe763ccf9b1" colspan="3">Residue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-cd7757ba51afef7145bb84f0e64556b9">
              <td id="6e792ee358d20ce56ae0443436dfed5a" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-36">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="cf04ed388febb15c8b748b45b956bff7" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-37">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-0e3f89c88399d8ef1145fdf21845c136">
              <td id="6ed905c3cb20864dde5224b453693c35" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-38">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="f85ed736a35c23b3e09a39e0dc9b8381" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-39">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-38">From the clause above, <italic id="_italic-40">I </italic>was as the Subject of the clause. <italic id="_italic-41">I </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and <italic id="_italic-42">do</italic> was as the Finite because the researchers split the verbal operator from the Predicators (the finite element is always fused with the other element, known as Predicator, <italic id="_italic-43">think</italic> is from <italic id="_italic-44">do</italic> + <italic id="_italic-45">think</italic>), <italic id="_italic-46">Senator coons </italic>as a compliment,<italic id="_italic-47"> is there</italic> as circumstances adjunct since telling adverb of place.  The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl5">
        <label>Table 5</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-13">Clause 5</bold><bold id="_bold-14">: </bold>And I think the governor’s around</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-40"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-5">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-a252623b202644cf4692ef3239a6da56">
              <td id="6c351bd0e345e98ce010046567b263af">And </td>
              <td id="7bfc58a25a5bede7ef2b48c795b909fa">I </td>
              <td id="e1d2b503d59326494d6ea42b087ab287">Do</td>
              <td id="ff2c9a0832e235f4cba217bbb2194524">Think</td>
              <td id="999679d3d62777a541d9f9ccc5f242ec">The governor’s around</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-61726d4691e0a331a4d2916454ac6594">
              <td id="62e4bb11eacfe68c6c11d35864967b2a">Con. Adjunct</td>
              <td id="88877f24ebdd8e185b6409573bd2e724">Subject</td>
              <td id="37a99cdac72b562880442a422e6ac592">Finite</td>
              <td id="538b06a53d202e8c41e0f7e14bf4e127">predicator</td>
              <td id="d6e090944ba917dc2646d7e7695adc97">Complement</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-852e68288ff030808b7cf4921f5502b1">
              <td id="b03e052a540f6ec458eb5d7bdd2aaa09">Re-</td>
              <td id="f05cb9ddd3ee079621de97f8cc76033c" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="4a3c6dcc8b69acc9b40eb244dcf7c248" colspan="2">-sidue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-81630bfc0a793ca39cced39e7b366e2b">
              <td id="f18ae7c6dd79eeafdb3a324bfb72cd48" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-48">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="f44be262c0771f69f613d2376947015b" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-49">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-78b333c648231a04cee7e567b863e46f">
              <td id="4cbd9ccdfa561725eca22072d33a60ca" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-50">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="efd80ef4de1be2269e0c481e366d01d6" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-51">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-41">From the clause above and<italic id="italic-1"> </italic>was<italic id="italic-abd880c79b3d43cbcabac1b6b77fbdab"> </italic>as a conjunctive adjunct because (<italic id="italic-c9ba940735d2495348a01ebb75192c94">And</italic>) was the cohesive conjunction and categorized as Conjunctive Adjunct to provide linking relations between one sentence and the others (linking sentences), <italic id="italic-4">I </italic>was as the Subject of the clause. <italic id="italic-5">I </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun, and <italic id="italic-6">do</italic> was as the Finite because the researchers split the verbal operator from the Predicators (the finite element is always fused with the other element, known as Predicator, <italic id="italic-7">think</italic> is from <italic id="italic-8">do</italic> + <italic id="italic-9">think</italic>), <italic id="italic-10">The governor’s around</italic> was as complement. The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. Statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl6">
        <label>Table 6</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-15">Clause 6</bold><bold id="_bold-16">: </bold>and is that Ruth Ann?</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-43"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-6">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-12769d33367e58710b47313e18cf80be">
              <td id="7ceaab708638f7cf49552eb4f32a4007">And</td>
              <td id="91fff8fbb2e5c1b3f187fc3cff1c299d">Is</td>
              <td id="1eb453ff4d6a724ab968f6996779d019" colspan="2">That</td>
              <td id="0bb42a2f9c03cb6211da2af3b0c11364">Ruth Ann?</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-7fd830c25f7e8baab077cb4c72adc45d">
              <td id="35c96e50ca5730b017b38b5a6983c61c">Con. Adjunct</td>
              <td id="c046f5778844b48c5d5ed533f690a1fc">Subject</td>
              <td id="28c213d91ff2cba530149d580887d4cf" colspan="2">Finite</td>
              <td id="2c4d804d934f0da812337077d6fd89d3">Complement</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-a19e0687df116575882fa03cd5b28511">
              <td id="3f34f63f19750b5c55ff9b6d319277ec">Re-</td>
              <td id="03168fcd19e0cc8b9c237e482a1996a5" colspan="3">Mood</td>
              <td id="629f1b15760d030126e24bf4fe4d9dbf">-sidue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-009f1ac521467880a17a543273ea6673">
              <td id="eb8372949c68554bc631fa04e3e60d0c" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-60">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="0b0b017d307f18c33a77e3fe1fa8d9bc" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-61">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-a04670112ef1c6ae627523ffb47f4f82">
              <td id="66acd65fd75b8ce2a2dd82c5fafb4a93" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-62">Question </italic>
              </td>
              <td id="21a33a544f031a0e7a60bb15323d85c0" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-63">Interrogative</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-44">From the clause above andwas as a conjunctive adjunct because (<italic id="_italic-64">And</italic>) was the cohesive conjunction and categorized as Conjunctive Adjunct to provide linking relations between one sentence and the others (linking sentences), <italic id="_italic-65">that </italic>as the Subject of the clause. <italic id="_italic-66">that </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and <italic id="_italic-67">is</italic> was as the Finite, <italic id="_italic-68">Ruth Ann </italic>was as a compliment. The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a question. A question occurs when the speaker wants to demand information about something from the listener. This can be seen from the grammatical structure of the Question in the form of Interrogative Mood (Mood Type is Interrogative Mood) functioning to demand information. </p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl7">
        <label>Table 7</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-17">Clause 7</bold><bold id="_bold-18">: </bold>And that’s former Governor Ruth Ann Minner.</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-46"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-7">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-7799687265026deb24caa90e71f45dc8">
              <td id="c6bb034ba0492a05dfa0f202a12a7bd9">And</td>
              <td id="f00d8d23fc35d360b7ea6f9013baa8f8">that</td>
              <td id="83fe80167b70804ed2c7a720840ba70a">Is</td>
              <td id="d50d381c6e8edb9409d36b1b5b9c16fd">former Governor Ruth Ann Minner.</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-9bcd48b7276f868ad57fbdf4710688e8">
              <td id="81120d9a4d347ab401bd109828598149">Con. Adjunct</td>
              <td id="7d973af11c88982b2417ad0a5eba3f59">Subject</td>
              <td id="769c5b0c7155a34053ee444b8724275d">Finite</td>
              <td id="3e0aa109deaebd793067ea21718dd8e1">Complement</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-0e6419b3eea7195ccb946471387c8226">
              <td id="edb66ff83ee2e7ee4f92543bf2fb1fd3">Re-</td>
              <td id="da07ead41d74a756c3066caaf02362a4" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="4d9a6f0be31526875d809fc42e22c87b">-sidue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-f6314581b7b055e91936ecd9321e3373">
              <td id="42157890cdda15b600aed7ca99279a3d" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-69">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="e7f160049b9a473aa50dbabfb759d53d">
                <italic id="_italic-70">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-c0d9d0f711755fc7f81c20b8fa8ab7f4">
              <td id="d189632acc875179d7c3e8629ff3a2e9" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-71">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="3bbebc707ede92f069aab6361b22d34e">
                <italic id="_italic-72">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-47">The clause above was as a conjunctive adjunct because (And) was the cohesive conjunction and categorized as a Conjunctive Adjunct to provide linking relations between one sentence and the others (linking sentences), that was as the Subject of the clause. That appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and was as the Finite, former Governor Ruth Ann Minner was a compliment. The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl8">
        <label>Table 8</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-19">Clause 8: </bold>Folks, the people of this nation have spoken.</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-49"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-8">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-c7fa0cdb13e31a43d84e378137b703f6">
              <td id="7d1d1f48b7c19905bd214397200a7c8b">Folks, the people of this nation</td>
              <td id="436e584970cd7247a97816266888d5cf">Have</td>
              <td id="60c667b79282b2efb9d006ab480475e7">spoken.</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-ea530606b3e63a123c7e76199f32d18b">
              <td id="ac4879303a454fdd36595bb93ce5a6cd">Subject</td>
              <td id="e0e2e33883b2b9969e1dd26527d2e41f">Finite</td>
              <td id="8586314309bf5fc9f68a5d1190dca13b">Predicator</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-869947b17d4e7d06675d7995b08f2bf0">
              <td id="34e86f41a50565e49c5782e169c2f1ba" colspan="2">Mood </td>
              <td id="38aaa78dd4eab8930523e6376c6d7708">Residue </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-5e8f7ab7c63bdaf8e2f98713eefbecc4">
              <td id="2b59ebfc02448ae5f1107ea056ed0094" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-73">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="a6235806aa0b20174c99df28e0d284b9">
                <italic id="_italic-74">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-29b63a0323e67a903f8289223bc3d9aa">
              <td id="84366ffe1d29ca60e6522392f5060416" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-75">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="58c23fc5a88df087aa309740dcc08d91">
                <italic id="_italic-76">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-50">From the clause above, <italic id="_italic-77">Folks, the people of this </italic><italic id="_italic-78">nation, were</italic> as the Subject of the clause. <italic id="_italic-79">Folks, the people of this nation </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and <italic id="_italic-80">have</italic> was as the Finite, <italic id="_italic-81">spoken </italic>was as the predictor. The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl9">
        <label>Table 9</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-20">Clause 9</bold>: They’ve delivered us a clear victory, a convincing victory, a victory for we, the people.</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-51"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-9">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-3c4b2cdc6f8902c4833cb820fb1269cc">
              <td id="7de9cb66e812e6945bc2e8a2f30075bd">They</td>
              <td id="75067085eb4bb914bec99d2e585a633c">Have</td>
              <td id="123e6b13df44017d12f210db208ffe97">Delivered</td>
              <td id="daf20a64bd877c28527c7684119fb46b">us a clear victory, a convincing victory, a victory</td>
              <td id="32a49cdf82cbc0592881afa0c1889e52">for we, the people.</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-e15effd69c5021e10e45fa59346fadcb">
              <td id="1b4bd28ff9dd702dda75e68ac08e9761">Subject</td>
              <td id="f55c107fb4119009dff0caeb8884aada">Finite</td>
              <td id="bed3ac2383ddd9d7d956b6e1f6aaa7d2">Predicator</td>
              <td id="659e598070ff1bdbaa9c071bf844a109">Complement</td>
              <td id="c62595b1374494e8981fe01ef8944e7b">Cir. Adjunct</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-19d518ddfad6a807f03631c79801b870">
              <td id="2a0050dfcb59644f792eef12c1b56fb9" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="6863a5b5f0985c8293096298e11c0e21" colspan="3">Residue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-5363dac20f1eba2255c22aba3906820c">
              <td id="ad0c70925225f0f74d2796ffe025fcde" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-82">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="9afbbdd26be286603da18c08d82fe3b6" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-83">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-a146f6038a2bb55ab723d32e4af51c4d">
              <td id="cc96382f149332e52370f7edb0ef58fe" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-84">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="ef30f70a7bbde65e9d04e7e76100f4ee" colspan="3">
                <italic id="_italic-85">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-53">From the clause above, <italic id="_italic-86">they </italic>were as the Subject of the clause. <italic id="_italic-87">They </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and <italic id="_italic-88">have</italic> been as the Finite, <italic id="_italic-89">delivered </italic>was as predicator, <italic id="_italic-90">us a clear victory, a convincing victory, a victory </italic>was as a complement, <italic id="_italic-91">for we, the people</italic><italic id="_italic-92">,</italic> was as circumstances adjunct. The researchers found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl10">
        <label>Table 10</label>
        <caption>
          <title><bold id="_bold-21">Clause 10</bold>: We’ve won with the most votes ever cast for a presidential ticket in the history of the nation. </title>
          <p id="_paragraph-55"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-10">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-18b0715e69d98bfd3608c03aaccaf0a3">
              <td id="73cde3343e2ae47d702dfa53b7d58b1f">We</td>
              <td id="ce0c50d79951c7ad24ae94ca3cebc465">Have</td>
              <td id="d40bd01effb7b3de97a4a1054b3aa23e">Won</td>
              <td id="1457fe8485dfbb20a3f0eaaf656664b0">with the most votes ever cast for a presidential ticket in the history of the nation.</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-a6d127456f21578a57a00f93aa7f2056">
              <td id="916bfdbdc0dba99a04aa869487ed2b2d">Subject</td>
              <td id="3f6eaf05b72317587713326d5ed79362">Finite</td>
              <td id="26184e1e8024d61fa69a2d2374818455">complement</td>
              <td id="ab6b46b7c9de72914dd7e6225585b92b">Cir. Adjunct</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-59c48009d568a1fca2d4a5c5eb3020a5">
              <td id="bae97cf8298a9a14a90ee8de00cfe4f2" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="aa39eec2c3a2746aeb69b212e0d89833" colspan="2">Residue</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-a7aa78dd0ef859806b161c459db1c751">
              <td id="67c6f5699a0c913fe8627385f5cc8d31" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-93">Speech Role</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="b7558a0c5ffaa2fb1371de96e85c98cd" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-94">Speech function</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-4277752e85d9a2be1fd7bec9e1a39d5f">
              <td id="37761dbf3f90af019652e65035a6ab3e" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-95">Giving information</italic>
              </td>
              <td id="36025ab41c8df25bb776e722ab954d01" colspan="2">
                <italic id="_italic-96">Declarative Statement</italic>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-56">From the clause above, <italic id="_italic-97">we </italic>were as the Subject of the clause. <italic id="_italic-98">We </italic>appeared as the element picked up by the pronoun and <italic id="_italic-99">have</italic> was as the Finite, <italic id="_italic-100">won </italic>was as a complement, <italic id="_italic-101">with the most votes ever cast for a presidential ticket in the history of the nation</italic> was as circumstances adjunct. The researcher found that this clause belonged to speech functions in the form of a statement. A statement occurs when the speaker wants to give information about something to the listener. From the data analysis presented above, taken from Joe Biden’s victory speech, there were two research findings: mood structures and speech functions. </p>
      <p id="_paragraph-57">
        <bold id="_bold-22">3.</bold>
        <bold id="_bold-24">1. </bold>
        <bold id="_bold-25">Mood Structure Types</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="_paragraph-58">After analyzing the data, the researchers calculated the number of mood structures and made a table showing the text-analysis results. Mood structure types were analyzed in this research, divided into mood and residue elements. Mood elements consist of a subject and finite, while residue elements consist of a predicator, complement, and adjunct. Adjunct is also divided into four types: mood adjunct, conjunctive adjunct, comment adjunct, and circumstantial adjunct.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl11">
        <label>Table 11</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Mood Structures in Joe Biden’s Victory speech</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-60"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-11">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-ac037f0501f1dd0d573e82a9322efa63">
              <td id="8e1c1de9bbed736f9332689703d497c9">
                <bold id="_bold-27">Mood Structure</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="5fa25fb065c3cc6dacf07b2c7008c876">
                <bold id="_bold-28">Frequency </bold>
              </td>
              <td id="9a8687b5db0d47863a4de71e74a202aa">
                <bold id="_bold-29">Percentage (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-b8205feb6b659971809d8ca906b7736c">
              <td id="e131f20e6a621ec762b2c12d959bd29c">Subject </td>
              <td id="d4a3280a9a6a1dafa915bf0ef1a02ad2">174</td>
              <td id="bbbe566334d656767682273dde31ea52">23.5 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-6d8011ab75dc1513d4c2dc5f7e1f4108">
              <td id="370d2ed2c106f96673f875a5066689e0">Finite </td>
              <td id="f3ac0daf0fd87e93831dbee02c42a3e5">176</td>
              <td id="383f9857e1facca3279f6350209b231e">23.8 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-8f87ba40a59ad08f8f56aae35963d8cb">
              <td id="f2d2bcdbe29fca80bd7026935682152b">Predicator</td>
              <td id="5b6c4b776ef4a33c56489924ffc17a1c">120</td>
              <td id="f5fe1dd60ec77ab543ad00789dcd2368">16,3 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-917b67042faa389188945d16cef4afad">
              <td id="511469e497a3a609df8b55ac6d9787e5">Complement</td>
              <td id="df959799dd7309b2206bbed7e9752762">133</td>
              <td id="4a005146c3975da14b81823dce2d9728">18 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-bf7f3fcb6ac30a060199202feb4e8cc1">
              <td id="8763aaba5f4c2a3e71d15f0444f0b260">Mood Adjunct</td>
              <td id="5f8c2a4717037ad2226884efe5246ce8">9</td>
              <td id="55b297e0b855f8dd0eff623e98670467">1.2 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-cbf8e1b62ca538ba225e53cdda42b5a2">
              <td id="96ef7a1066e8bea489d1a14e184886d6">Circumstantial Adjunct</td>
              <td id="c7cbefdf0437424288edde7842634a2e">71</td>
              <td id="90bbe4a85d1c68b423a423ccbba63cdb">9.7 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-32f380a9cb57a07fc975815d75df0977">
              <td id="9d19e10fe9dd8405cf672cceeef11d8f">Comment Adjunct</td>
              <td id="cf5f7fe6b7a9d0659ab9f1b411c19cca">2</td>
              <td id="d49aa1a0abcdb93cfcbb64a8d956db6c">0.2 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-557829bb65d6efd1c58c94dd97e1f375">
              <td id="0fa801a0772bfcfc5a5eeb89e1c71905">Conjunctive Adjunct</td>
              <td id="656cba5cd45d3a75594e5f36780a77f0">54</td>
              <td id="e9920d1bcd00af945c529a4c88ce8659">7.3 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-e8206649e0bee646a80e6303739ded63">
              <td id="01e2e5cbf048430dc9fbc322942b8642">
                <bold id="_bold-30">Total</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="a333c1c969cdc8a0e48673ed61a30b55">739</td>
              <td id="2d6db6be470c6901b4387ccfd0d6e610">100 %</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-61">From the table 11 of the diagram above, it can be concluded that to find the percent of mood structure types is the appearing number of types divided by the total number of data and multiplied by one hundred so that the results will be found. The Mood structures found in Joe Biden’s Victory Speech based on Yule theory found that there were 174 (23.5%) subjects and 176 (23.8%) finites, 120 (16.3%) predicators, 133 (18%) complements, 9 (1.2%) mood adjuncts, 71 (9.7%) circumstantial adjuncts, 2 (0.2%) comment adjuncts and 54 (7,3%) conjunctive adjuncts presented in the following bar chart.</p>
      <fig id="figure-panel-85a1858eadb4e4bdb1892b2fd5966b7d">
        <label>Figure 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p id="paragraph-acbcf89d6556aa9430185f8af8de1709"/>
        </caption>
        <graphic id="graphic-ca9ece667c291fb1161079e9a816ae33" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="Picture 1.png"/>
      </fig>
      <p id="_paragraph-62"><bold id="_bold-31">Figure 1</bold><bold id="_bold-32">:</bold> Mood Structures in Joe Biden’s Victory Speech.</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-63">
        <bold id="_bold-33">3.</bold>
        <bold id="_bold-35">2. </bold>
        <bold id="_bold-36">Speech Function Types</bold>
      </p>
      <p id="_paragraph-64">Clauses were also analyzed in this research. The speech function types included Statement, Question, Offer, and Command.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl12">
        <label>Table 12</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Speech Function Types Found in Joe Biden’s Victory Speech</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-66"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-12">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-1faa734be5551ca9e23917eca1e89c01">
              <td id="a9fb3557121fdfaaa24ec609349294dd">
                <bold id="_bold-38">Speech Function</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="00143c7b1bc0ad9b9357822ae7f0306f">
                <bold id="_bold-39">Frequency</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="3f58d21bdb0b8106ad78d91fd31451ab">
                <bold id="_bold-40">Percentage (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-925a693f1904c3af61959d8781cadaef">
              <td id="a2b260e45a70151a6b951dadb305dd01">Statement</td>
              <td id="50b1eef7193432fdc88a61e6bbee2bdc">162</td>
              <td id="7e8ed53bef63179d57a51f05f5494e27">92%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-b01f1c453a987a217d7093111c22fcbb">
              <td id="856eca3344d1801394190c919eb6d478">Question </td>
              <td id="9a7024c8a2ea56e510aea46acfcd82a6">4</td>
              <td id="8d2b3abae63617e7ed3a5ef4ea19adac">2%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-b13c4548ab6a565b615cc59f02555c96">
              <td id="e4137dd6c834b9c0d5802826cdfdc637">Offer</td>
              <td id="b12b32bd5ea4b2a054927ed717558b4d">7</td>
              <td id="dca787733a27b19fbe16024cdb1846d7">4 %</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-ebdae8a97a6dec3acaf16f36f1151f97">
              <td id="7322cc3e218a11a73f73820e1fd6f4ee">Command</td>
              <td id="5f3c7f65be97deb3d9b9dbf605a1e28b">4</td>
              <td id="293c4c00243d07450dee477ed7037135">2%</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-6fb02af2ea991fcb7b649b2ecfab0821">
              <td id="65155b21122bf9839d1c419aa82b0948">
                <bold id="_bold-41">Total</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="7da69b4fea37d4781f4348c08b7f7461">177</td>
              <td id="1ca88b95faeb11fc40f1d82108f62570">100%</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-67">The table above shows that there were 177 data found in Joe Biden’s victory speech. There are four Speech Function types found in the analyzed data consisting of a statement occurring 162 times (92%), a question occurring 4 times (2%), Command occurring 4 (2%), and an Offer occurring 7 times (4%). From the explanation above, the researchers found that the most dominant Speech Function type used by Joe Biden in his victory speech was a statement. In addition, the findings related to the implicature types are shown in the following chart.</p>
      <fig id="figure-panel-04b08993c6b5773127defd752c2cbac9">
        <label>Figure 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p id="paragraph-0593f14723edde345bf66e5f4573d169"/>
        </caption>
        <graphic id="graphic-7899a050c1192ead17e9ee83e688cbdb" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="Picture 2.png"/>
      </fig>
      <p id="_paragraph-68"><bold id="_bold-42">Figure 2</bold>: The percentage of Speech Function Types</p>
      <p id="_paragraph-69">The researchers found four data belonging to the generalized conversational implicature. The type of generalized conversational implicature depended on the context and needed no particular background knowledge to understand what was talked about. In this context, it was known that the context was about Joe Biden’s victory speech published by the Washington Post web. Thus, most people could understand what was generally implied in the announcement.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-e333a67d7773092137596820dada0585">
      <title>
        <bold id="bold-ed046dc14263f1f217d87467d25b5c0d">4. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-efcb6f4ae95c94f10148668f77878a50">Discussion</bold>
      </title>
      <p id="paragraph-9966d7483d9f42e6f95a440f0160d167">After analyzing and classifying the above data, the researchers made a clear discussion on mood structures and speech functions of Interpersonal meaning to answer the previously stated research questions. In mood structures, the researchers found Subject (23.5%) and Finite (23.8%), predicator (16.3%), complement (18%), mood adjuncts (1.2%), circumstantial adjuncts (9.7%), comment adjuncts (0.2%), and conjunctive adjuncts (7.3%). The researchers also found speech functions in the form of a statement (92%), question (2%), Command (2%), and Offer (4%). Some examples of speech analyzed based on mood structures, and speech functions are as follows.<bold id="bold-3"/></p>
      <p id="paragraph-b28c6a852b5c912321910c678c89974b">The American story is about slow yet steadily widening opportunities in America. Make no mistake, too many dreams have been deferred for too long. We must make the promises of the country real for everybody, no matter their race, their ethnicity, their faith, their identity or their disability.”</p>
      <p id="paragraph-4470913473bd5e5a2a62d5ee8368c01c">Based on the utterances above, the realization of mood was analyzed as follows. “The American story is about the slow<bold id="bold-4"> </bold>Yet Steadily Widening the Opportunities in America” (Speech function: statement). The word “The American story” was as Subject, the word “is” was as finite, the word “about” was as predicator, the word “slow” was a complement, and the word Yet Steadily Widening the Opportunities in America” was as an adjunct. So, based on mood structures, “the American story is” was as a mood and “about the slow, yet steadily widening the opportunities in America.” was as residue. This statement means America’s development was not maximized yet.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl13">
        <label>Table 13</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Mood Structures “The American Story is about Slow, Yet Steadily Widening the Opportunities in America.”</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-73"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-13">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-3bed6551fa312a750012b55ef13b8b7a">
              <td id="b871945dc0cf24a00597c84fc11616c7">
                <bold id="_bold-43">The American story</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="88a5f3f2702775068fafbe5ca61606e1">
                <bold id="_bold-44">Is</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="9f474b90604dd7fb6746b9f3193663a0">
                <bold id="_bold-45">About</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="81e80676e9e21825f4910e4d871de9d4">
                <bold id="_bold-46">Slow</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="53dc757ddbed5d2ef3dce463d38a1284">
                <bold id="_bold-47">Yet Steadily Widening the Opportunities in America</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-36a7ef999dec93a4e3ff208af24a59fc">
              <td id="d5f067bcafe48d3a2e30a938d14e3ef5">Subject</td>
              <td id="d38246b153a7a375bd144f3d124e8ac5">Finite</td>
              <td id="6c396edabe3bd0e62f4794efdbe50383">Predicator</td>
              <td id="30a307c36d975fe3c06505fb62b11b56">Complement</td>
              <td id="fe9b3f03f6f5c4e934b535ea22326c15">Adjunct</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-6d5c43316fa47a45d375e72846b5fe8f">
              <td id="89ce46cf3d9bd5604e6c08b1a03cdc75" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="35ae743d781beee72ee4cbb737042c2d" colspan="3">Residue</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-75">The realization of mood was found in the sentence, “Make no mistake, too many dreams have been deferred for too long.” (Speech function: command). The word “make” was as finite, “no mistake” was as a complement, and the word “too many dreams have been deferred for too long.” was as circumstantial adjuncts. So, based on mood structures, “make” was as mood and “no mistake, too many dreams have been deferred for too long.” was as residue.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl14">
        <label>Table 14</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Mood Structures “Make no mistake, too many dreams have been deferred for too long.”</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-77"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-14">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-605f93139e7278c022709d05c274fc6c">
              <td id="3d2e6c2013a56aaab45107c7e5a17ea5">
                <bold id="_bold-50">(You)</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="0805c1864d226d3c689ba360ec577449">
                <bold id="_bold-51">Make</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="0263d273c44f1e15c851e16726ee893e">
                <bold id="_bold-52">no mistake</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="368db8d126f4d05d9814b5bc9dd70b31">
                <bold id="_bold-53">too many dreams have been deferred for too long.</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-a9706241c3888d23d7ee3fae6712e3fe">
              <td id="04b537ff4d4134038c879858c3b1b24d">subject</td>
              <td id="351b3277cec086ad2fbed6100d100ad9">Finite</td>
              <td id="fa17502bb42c4c0c3210ba994b1bfb04">Complement</td>
              <td id="12e88699c5c4e39aed652c7965d1192a">Adjunct</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-07abdb01a10732997cf33896f5a4468f">
              <td id="a513578f9f9d6792102a7a66661a028a" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="3095398620253451737d235690b46b3a" colspan="2">Residue</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="_paragraph-78">The realization of mood was found in the sentence, “We must make the promises of the country real for everybody, no matter their race, their ethnicity, their faith, their identity or their disability.” (Speech function: command). The word “We” was as a subject, the word “must” was as finite, the word “make” was as predicator, the word “The promise of the country real” was as complement, and the word “For everybody, no matter their race, their ethnicity, their faith, their identity, or their disability was as circumstances adjuncts. So, based on mood structures, “We must” was as mood and “make the promises of the country real for everybody, no matter their race, their ethnicity, their faith, their identity or their disability” was as residue.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl15">
        <label>Table 15</label>
        <caption>
          <title>Mood Structures “We must make the promises of the country real for everybody, no matter their race, their ethnicity, their faith, their identity or their disability.”</title>
          <p id="_paragraph-80"/>
        </caption>
        <table id="_table-15">
          <tbody>
            <tr id="table-row-38f9b16e78ba3d943b265c39ee611c80">
              <td id="fce956cfc1d418455e604e64e8fae259">
                <bold id="_bold-55">We</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="094482995d5f46cee6a4383fc36b2d44">
                <bold id="_bold-56">Must</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="8d8b68082fa3e88c4aef48d79a3b2330">
                <bold id="_bold-57">Make</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="13468b8d197280d310e72bdcdaa1049e">
                <bold id="_bold-58">The promise of the country real</bold>
              </td>
              <td id="787107c39502348f8f364c885c5f16bc">
                <bold id="_bold-59">For everybody, no matter their race, their ethnicity, their faith, their identity, or their disability</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-14641830735e504efb58463b49708527">
              <td id="1912888f72f55ee1af72d4fa3ba8fbd8">Subject</td>
              <td id="c0f24395a689f9d7e5e779ffd1dd8d05">Finite</td>
              <td id="07c835ea05d35b4a14aa1e8c2da0a118">Predicator</td>
              <td id="e7a65596518d0dbbc43223519977934c">Complement</td>
              <td id="6d083d2467d7aefddbab3965fd1a4940">Cir. Adjunct</td>
            </tr>
            <tr id="table-row-f3bd48dab63967a95c08f71488e08562">
              <td id="a81aa8993e492d23b324312a4bcfefa9" colspan="2">Mood</td>
              <td id="cbc89e16bc11158365f3b5e5adb50f92" colspan="3">Residue</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p id="paragraph-6d07ba7db3335db22b592d964c987631">This study was supported by a previous study in the related field. There were similarities and comparisons between this study and the previous one. The previous study, "Interpersonal Meaning in Sri Mulyani Indrawati's Speech", from Universitas Sumatera Utara in 2017from (Syafirah, 2017). This study looked at the interpersonal meaning found in Sri Mulyani Indrawati's speech through mood structures and speech functions used. The qualitative research design was adopted in this study. The transcripts from Sri Mulyani Indrawati's commencement speech to the students at the University of Virginia were used as the research data source. The data for this study was gathered using a documentation method. The researchers used four steps to analyze the data, as suggested by Miles, Huberman, and Saldana, stating that data analysis consists of four components: data collection, data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The researchers found that there were mood elements in Sri Mulyani Indrawati's speech, consisting of 141 subjects, and 158 finites, 117 predicators, 122 complements, 27 mood adjuncts, 75 circumstantial adjuncts, 3 comment adjuncts, and 67 conjunctive adjuncts as the residue elements. Speech Functions have resulted from the specific actions from the cross-categorization of Speech Roles and Commodity Exchanges in four basic moves: statement, question, offer, and command.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="heading-57d8252cfe8e6e6e04715090d79aba92">
      <title>
        <bold id="bold-90948203b2712145a68e56a28a1f0ecc">5. </bold>
        <bold id="bold-96e964d76cd90dfe401f55573bdf385d">Conclusion</bold>
      </title>
      <p id="paragraph-674f7a9a1e80e2eb8fc0d6a607cc2063">A speaker may have a different status, serve different goals, and impact on audience depending on how mood, modality, and personal pronouns are used. The speaker assumed that the roles of information processor and deliverer in the text under investigation used an interpersonal function in the form of declarative mood. In addition, the speaker developed a close bond with the American audience, which allowed him asking support and provide information to share. Instructional implications were also found in this study. Interaction is crucial in the classroom to success the language acquisition. Interpersonal contact in the classroom is impacted by the students' communication errors leading to meaningful negotiation, explanation requests, or message restructuring. Teachers and students may be able to engage, exchange meanings, and adopt positions more successfully if they are aware of how language serves interpersonal functions.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-7cd8c63036742c1c73ce6fe8921bc713">The greater significance lie in this understanding encouragings in the fact that this understanding encourages classroom agents to uphold their relationships, shape behaviors, and communicate their opinions. To indicate how information Certain grammatical elements, such as subject-verb agreement and finite and modal pronouns, are used to indicate how information is transmitted, certain grammatical elements, such as subject-verb agreement as well as finite and modal pronouns, are used. In other words, the ability to develop and preserve social ties throughout exchanges is one of the more difficult aspects in learning a language. By examining the mood systems, modalities, and pronouns used in response to the discourse moves occurring in the classroom interactions from the SFL point of view, these difficulties may be successfully controlled.</p>
      <p id="paragraph-5535c6046eec42544ceef56f578a675e"/>
      <p id="paragraph-5d3daf1aed419796acfed1d1df7f7c6f"/>
      <p id="paragraph-881aeb3ec373409b2809abee5b23a1a7"/>
    </sec>
  </body><back/></article>
