Face and Identity in Intercultural Conflict Management

Min Hou (1)
(1) School of languages, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, China , China

Abstract

Face negotiation theory has been an influential theory of intercultural conflict management. However, as a theory of functional approach, it has limitations in analyzing dynamic conflict management process. Using repeated episodic interviews, this paper attempts to combine this theory with Spencer-Oatey’s (2007) face and identity model as well as post-structural perspectives of identity to analyze the dynamic and complicated conflict management process in two Chinese overseas students’ cases. The findings reveal that face and identity are critical to spell out the dynamics and complexity of the intercultural conflict management process and examining the motives and reasons for the choice of a particular facework strategy.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Anderson, J. A. (1987). Communication research: Issues and methods. McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.

Aveni, V. A. P. (2005). Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. Cambridge University Press.

Baig, N., Ting-Toomey, S., & Dorjee, T. (2014). Intergenerational narratives on face: a South Asian Indian American perspective. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(2), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2014.898362

Baxter, J. (2016). 'Positioning language and identity: Poststructuralist perspective.' in S. Preece (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of language and Identity (Routledge: London and New York).

Block, D. (2007). Second language identities (Continuum: London).

Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Cai, D., & Fink, E. (2002). Conflict style differences between individualists and collectivists. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216536

Carballal-Broome, A., & Pinillos, M.-J. (2022). International career aspirations: Can multicultural personality traits predict the interest in working abroad? Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22(2), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v22i2.35

Department of Education (2019, May 9). Welcome to the Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.au/

Dervin, F. 2012. 'Cultural identity, representation and othering.' in J. Jackson (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication (Routledge: London).

Dorjee, T., Baig, N., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2013). A social ecological perspective on understanding “honor killing”: An intercultural moral dilemma. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 42(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2012.723024

Flick, U (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4 ed.) (SAGE Publications: London).

Flick, U. (2006). An Introduction to qualitative research (SAGE Publications: London).

Gao, G., and Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). 'Intercultural conflict style: A face-negotiation theory.' in Y. Y. Kim and W. B. Gudykunst (eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (Sage: Newbury Park, CA).

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. (No Title). (Anchor Books: New York).

Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (No. 3). University of Pennsylvania Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: SAGE. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry (SAGE: London). https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory:‘Face’revisited and renewed. Journal of pragmatics, 21(5), 451-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6

Martin, Judith N., and Thomas K. Nakayama. 2007. Intercultural communication in contexts (McGraw-Hill: Boston).

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning. In Identity and Language Learning. Multilingual matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090563

Oetzel, J. G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication research, 30(6), 599-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203257841

Oetzel, J. G., Ting‐Toomey, S., Yokochi, Y., Masumoto, T., & Takai, J. (2000). A typology of facework behaviors in conflicts with best friends and relative strangers. Communication Quarterly, 48(4), 397-419.https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370009385606

Passarelli, A. M., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Using experiential learning theory to promote student learning and development in programs of education abroad. Student learning abroad: What our students are learning, what they’re not, and what we can do about it, 137-161.

Rintell, E. (1990). That’s incredible: Stories of emotion told by second language learners and native speakers’ in R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, and S. Krashen (eds): Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language.

Riyanto, B., Nurmala, E., Agustina, I., & Maidari, S. R. (2023). Indonesian Seafarers’ Intercultural Communication Challenges With Multinational Crews. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(1), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i1.92

Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of pragmatics, 39(4), 639-656.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004

Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2008). Culturally speaking second edition: Culture, communication and politeness theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Spencer-Oatey, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Culture, context, and concerns about face: Synergistic insights from pragmatics and social psychology. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(4), 423-440.https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19865293

Stryker, S. (1976). 'Die theories des symbolischen interaktionismus.' in M. Auwärter, E. Kirsch and K. Schröter (eds.), Seminar. Kommunication, Interaktion, Identität. (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt).

Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). 'The matrix of the face: an updated face-negotiation theory.' in W.B. Gudykunst (ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA).

Ting-Toomey, S. (2007). Intercultural conflict training: Theory-practice approaches and research challenges. Journal of intercultural communication research, 36(3), 255-271.https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737199

Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.)^(eds.). (1988). Intercultural conflict style: A face-negotiation theory (Sage: Newbury Park, CA).

Ting-Toomey, S. (ed.)^(eds.). (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues (State University of New York Press: Albany).

Ting-Toomey, S. 1993. 'Communicative resourcefulness: An identity negotiation theory.' in R. L. Wiseman and J. Koester (eds.), Intercultural communication competence (Sage: Newbury Park, CA).

Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International journal of intercultural relations, 22(2), 187-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00004-2

Ting‐Toomey, S. (2017). Facework and face negotiation theory. The international encyclopedia of intercultural communication, 1-5.

Ting‐Toomey, S., Gao, G., Trubisky, P., Yang, Z., Soo Kim, H., Lin, S. L., & Nishida, T. (1991). Culture, face maintenance, and styles of handling interpersonal conflict: A study in five cultures. International Journal of conflict management, 2(4), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022702

Tracy, Karen. (1990). 'The many faces of facework.' in H. Giles and W. P. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (John Wiley and Sons: Chichester).

Trubisky, P., Ting-Toomey, S., & Lin, S. L. (1991). The influence of individualism-collectivism and self-monitoring on conflict styles. International journal of intercultural relations, 15(1), 65-84.https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(91)90074-Q

Wei, L. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of pragmatics, 43(5), 1222-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035

Xie, M., & Chao, C.-C. (2022). The Interplay between Social Media and Cultural Adjustment: Analysis of the Subjective Well-Being, Social Support, and Social Media Use of Asian International Students in the U.S. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 22(2), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v22i2.37

Yu, M. C. (2003). On the universality of face: Evidence from Chinese compliment response behavior. Journal of pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1679-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00074-2

Zhang, Q., Oetzel, J. G., Ting-Toomey, S., & Zhang, J. (2019). Making up or getting even? The effects of face concerns, self-construal, and apology on forgiveness, reconciliation, and revenge in the United States and China. Communication Research, 46(4), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215607959

Zhang, Qin. (2017). 'Intercultural conflict and conflict management.' in YoungYun Kim and Kelly L. McKay-Semmler (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.).

Zhou, V. X., & Pilcher, N. (2019). Tapping the thirdness in the intercultural space of dialogue. Language and Intercultural Communication, 19(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1545025

Authors

Min Hou
hou_minmin@126.com (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Min Hou, School of languages, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, China

Min Hou is an Associate Professor in the School of Languages at Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai, China. Her research interests include Intercultural Communication, Second language acquisition, and English as an International Language.

Hou, M. (2023). Face and Identity in Intercultural Conflict Management. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i2.55

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
Views
  • Abstract 171212
  • PDF 460
  • XML 0