Intercultural Living Together, the Integration and Recognition of Self and Other: Applied Intercultural Ethics

Charles Biradzem Dine

Abstract

Rising global multidimensional migration has altered human/cultural interaction where one now needs to welcome another and the other needs to be welcome. Notwithstanding the intensified interaction, the resulting intercultural paradigm encounters myriad dehumanizing, alienating and subjugating challenges. While juxtaposing Europe’s and Quebec’s intercultural experiences, this article examines these challenges as fallouts of the difficulties or the unwillingness to complement the integration and recognition of self and other in fostering interactive intercultural communication to achieve intercultural living together. It underscores the exploitation of a pragmatic aptitude toward applied intercultural ethics – otherwise known as practical wisdom – to enhance deliberative reciprocity and motivate introversive and extroversive enhancements of the transition from simple living together to intercultural living together.

Keywords:
    applied intercultural ethics, deliberative reciprocity, integration, recognition, intercultural communication, , , , , intercultural living together

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Barrett, M. (2011). Intercultural competence. EWC Statement Series, 2:23-27. Retrieved 25 May 2022 from https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/esploro/outputs/99515252302346

Barrett, M. (2013). Interculturalism and Multiculturalism: Similarities and Differences. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Bourgeault, I., R. Dingwall & R. De Vries. (2010). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. Sage.

Cortina, A., D. García-Marzá & J. Conill (2017). Public Reason and Applied Ethics: The Ways of Practical Reason in a Pluralist Society. Taylor & Francis.

Council of Europe (2013). La cité interculturelle pas à pas: Guide pour l’application du modèle urbain d’intégration interculturelle.

Council of Europe (2008). White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue: Living Together as Equals in Dignity.

Dasli, M. (2017). Intercultural education of tolerance and hospitality. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(5):676-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1135308

Deardorff, D.K. (2009). The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence. SAGE.

Deardorff, D.K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence, In J.D. Penn (ed.), Assessing Complex General Education Student Learning Outcomes: New Directions for Institutional Research (65-79). https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.381

Ferri, G. (2018). Intercultural Communication: Critical Approaches and Future Challenges. Springer.

Gojkov-Rajić, A. & J. Prtljaga (2013). Foreign language learning as a factor of intercultural tolerance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93:809-813.

Graber, C.B. (2006). The new UNESCO convention on cultural diversity: A counterbalance to the WTO? Journal of International Economic Law, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgl018

Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT Press.

Hoffmaster, B. (2018). From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics. Bioethics, 32(2):119-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12419

Huber, J. (2012). Intercultural Competence for All: Preparation for Living in a Heterogeneous World (Volume 2). Council of Europe.

ICCAR/OIMVe (2019). Politiques municipales sur le Vivre ensemble. Geneva: UNESCO. Accessed 26 May 2022 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368169_fre

Idang, G.E. (2015). African culture and values. Phronimon, 16(2):97-111. Accessed 26 May 2022 from https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/EJC189182

Joy, M. (2011). After Appropriation: Explorations in Intercultural Philosophy and Religion. University of Calgary Press.

Kroeber, A.L. & C. Kluckhohn (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard University, 47(1): viii, 223.

Lapiņa, L. (2016). Besides Conviviality. De Gruyter.

Leeds-Hurwitz, W. & K. Stenou (2013). Intercultural Competences: Conceptual and Operational Framework. Unesco.

McAndrew, M. (2007). Québec immigration, integration and intercultural Policy: A critical assessment. Indian Journal of Federal Studies, 15(1):1-18.

Meer, N. & T. Modood (2012). How does interculturalism contrast with m ulticulturalism? Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(2): 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2011.618266

Motilal, S. (2010). Applied Ethics and Human Rights: Conceptual Analysis and Contextual Applications. Anthem Press.

Novikova, I.A & A.L Novikov (2013). Tolerance types and features of intercultural adaptation in international students. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(7): 625. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n7p625

Oduaran, A. & H.J. Nenty (2008). Learning to Live Together in Sub-Saharan Africa: Linking Cultural Diversity, Conflict Prevention and Resolution Practices, UNESCO.

Perkins, H.S. (2006). Ethics expertise and cultural competence. Virtual Mentor, 8(2): 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2006.8.2.ccas3-0602

Rachida, A. (2017). Les compétences interculturelles: Au-delà du savoir-être. Interventions auprès des jeunes en contexte de diversité, 116.

Ricœur, P. (2015). Soi-même comme un autre. Le Seuil.

Ricœur, P. (1990). Soi-même comme un autre. Le Seuil.

Rondeau, D. (2013). Une épistémologie interculturelle comme condition du pluralisme. The Tocqueville Review / La revue Tocqueville, 34(1):43-63. https://doi.org/10.3138/ttr.34.1.43

Saillant, F., M. Kilani & F. Graezer Bideau (2011). Manifeste de Lausanne. Pour une anthropologie non hégémonique. Cahiers d'Études Africaines, 53(211): 764-767.

Stenou, K. (2002). UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity: A Vision, a Conceptual Platform, a Pool of Ideas for Implementation, a New Paradigm (Cultural Diversity Series No. 1). UNESCO.

Taylor, C. (2012). Interculturalism or multiculturalism? Philosophy & Social Criticism, 38(4-5): 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0191453711435656

UNESCO (2013). Intercultural Competences Conceptual and Operational Framework. UNESCO.

UNESCO (2009). Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue. UNESCO.

UNESCO (1995). Declaration of Principles on Tolerance. UNESCO Office of International Standards and Legal Affairs.

Watt, P. (2006). An intercultural approach to “integration”. Translocations, 1(1): 154-163. Accessed 26 May 2022 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.604.2660&rep=rep1&type=pdf

White, B.W. (2016). Le vivre-ensemble comme scénario de l’interculturel au Québec. Pluralité et vivre-ensemble (2015):39-62.

White, B.W. (2017a). Intercultural Cities: Policy and Practice for a New Era. Springer.

White, B.W. (2017b). Pensée pluraliste dans la cité: l’action interculturelle à Montréal. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 41(3): 29-57. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043041ar

White, B.W & E. Lemomba (2014). Introduction: le défi interculturel. In B.W. White & E. Lemomba (eds.), L’interculturel au Québec: rencontres historiques et enjeux politiques. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.

White, B.W, D. Gratton & F. Rocher (2015). Les conditions de l’inclusion en contexte interculturel: Mémoire présenté à la Commission des relations avec les citoyens. Ministère de l’Immigration, de la Diversité et de l’Inclusion.

Wilson, H.F. (2014). The possibilities of tolerance: Intercultural dialogue in a multicultural Europe. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5): 852-868. https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fd13063p

Wise, A. & G. Noble (2016). Convivialities: An orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(5):423-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1213786

Authors

Charles Biradzem Dine
Charles.biradzem.dine@umontreal.ca (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Charles Biradzem Dine, University of Montréal, Canada

Charles Biradzem Dine is a PhD candidate in applied human sciences at the University of Montreal, Canada. He holds a BA in philosophy, a master’s in philosophy of ethics and a maîtrise in applied ethics. His research works are often interdisciplinary, inclining towards applied ethics, cultural diversity, and human wellbeing. He is a student member of the Laboratoire de Recherche en Relations Interculturelles at the University of Montreal and of the Groupe de recherche Ethos at the Université du Québec à Rimouski.

Dine, C. B. (2022). Intercultural Living Together, the Integration and Recognition of Self and Other: Applied Intercultural Ethics. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 21(3), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v21i3.21

Article Details