Promotive Voice, Leader-member Exchange, and Creativity Endorsement: The Role of Supervisor-Attributed Motives

Israr Ahmad (1) , Ramayah Thurasamy (2) , Ahmad Adeel (3) , Bushra Alam (4)
(1) School of Managememt, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang Malaysia , Pakistan
(2) School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia , Malaysia
(3) Department of Business Education, The University of Chenab, Pakistan , Pakistan
(4) School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok , Pakistan


Employee voice is perceived as an approach with both significant advantages and disadvantages. The current study aims to analyse the behaviours of supervisors when endorsing the ideas of employees who raise promotive voices and consider the employees positively for the development of quality relationships. Specifically, 970 employees were recruited from various small and medium enterprises (SMEs), including manufacturing and electronics companies, in Pakistan for the current study participation. Data collection was conducted in two stages through two sources (supervisors and subordinates) before examining the collected data on the Mplus software for random coefficient regression analyses. Subordinates’ promotive voice was significantly and positively correlated to the Leader-Member-Exchange (LMX) quality and creative idea endorsement when supervisors interpreted the voice as driven more by performance enhancement motives instead of impression management motives. The findings suggested that performance enhancement motives and impression management motives would produce contrasting material consequences for subordinates. The present study limitations and future research directions were also discussed.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Afsar, B., Shahjehan, A., Shah, S. I., & Wajid, A. (2019). The mediating role of transformational leadership in the relationship between cultural intelligence and employee voice behavior: A case of hotel employees. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 69, 66-75. doi:

Ahmad, A., Samreen, B., Kee Mui Hung, D., Zain-ul-Abdeen, M., & Muhammad Kamran, K. (2022). Leader-member exchange and creative idea validation: The role of helping and bullying. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 27(2), 107–134. doi:10.21315/aamj2022.27.2.6

Ahmed, K., Adeel, A., Ali, R., & Rehman, R. U. (2019). Organizational democracy and employee outcomes: The mediating role of organizational justice. Business Strategy & Development, 2(3), 204-219. doi:

Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions: sage.

Algoe, S. B., & Haidt, J. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: the ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105-127. doi:10.1080/17439760802650519

Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: a field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 247-260. doi:

Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational behavior and human performance, 32(3), 370-398. doi:

Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. Voice and silence in organizations, 175-202.

Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of management journal, 34(2), 251-280. doi:

Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management review, 33(3), 670-684. doi:

Azevedo, M. C. d., Schlosser, F., & McPhee, D. (2021). Building organizational innovation through HRM, employee voice and engagement. Personnel Review, 50(2), 751-769. doi:10.1108/PR-12-2019-0687

Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological methods, 8(3), 338–363. doi:

Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of management journal, 39(6), 1538-1567. doi:

Benedek, M., Bruckdorfer, R., & Jauk, E. (2020). Motives for Creativity: Exploring the What and Why of Everyday Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 610-625. doi:

Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1974). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human communication research, 1(2), 99-112. doi:

Bowler, W. M., Paul, J. B., & Halbesleben, J. R. (2019). LMX and Attributions of Organizational Citizenship Behavior Motives: When is Citizenship Perceived as Brownnosing? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 139-152. doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9526-5

Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of management journal, 55(4), 851-875. doi:

Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 912-922. doi:

Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of Voice and Its Promotive and Prohibitive Forms: Identification of Key Associations, Distinctions, and Future Research Directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11-71. doi:10.1111/peps.12185

Chen, A., & Trevino, L. K. (2022). Promotive and prohibitive ethical voice: Coworker emotions and support for the voice. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi:

Cheng, J.-W., Lu, K.-M., Chang, Y.-Y., & Johnstone, S. (2013). Voice behavior and work engagement: the moderating role of supervisor-attributed motives. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 81-102. doi:

Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Management, 29(3), 62-74.

Culiberg, B., & Mihelič, K. K. (2017). The Evolution of Whistleblowing Studies: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(4), 787-803. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3237-0

Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21(1), 249-270. doi:

Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management review, 11(3), 618-634. doi:

Dockery, T. M., & Steiner, D. D. (1990). The Role of the Initial Interaction in Leader-Member Exchange. Group & Organization Studies, 15(4), 395-413. doi:10.1177/105960119001500405

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management review, 20(1), 65-91. doi:

Duan, J., Lapointe, É., Xu, Y., & Brooks, S. (2019). Why do employees speak up? Examining the roles of LMX, perceived risk and perceived leader power in predicting voice behavior. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(8), 560-572. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0534

Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of management, 38(6), 1715-1759. doi:

Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management review, 18(3), 397-428. doi:

Eastman, K. K. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of management journal, 37(5), 1379-1391. doi:

Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., & Walter, J. (2015). Deeds that Help and Words that Hurt: Helping and Gossip as Moderators of the Relationship Between Leader–Member Exchange and Advice Network Centrality. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 185-214. doi:

Farh, C. I. C., & Chen, Z. J. (2014). Beyond the Individual Victim: Multilevel Consequences of Abusive Supervision in Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1074-1095. doi:10.1037/a0037636

Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of management journal, 57(4), 1013-1034. doi:

FISEK, G. O. (1991). A Cross-Cultural Examination of Proximity and Hierarchy as Dimensions of Family Structure. Family Process, 30(1), 121-133. doi:

Fuller, J. B., Barnett, T., Hester, K., Relyea, C., & Frey, L. (2007). An exploratory examination of voice behavior from an impression management perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 134-151.

Gentile, M. C. (2010). New Haven: Yale University Press.

Gorden, W. I. (1988). Range of employee voice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1(4), 283-299. doi:10.1007/BF01556937

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247. doi:

Graham, A. C. (1986). Yin-Yang and the nature of correlative thinking (Vol. 6): Institute of East Asian Philosophies Singapore.

Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48. doi:

Green, S. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader—member interactions. Organizational behavior and human performance, 23(3), 429-458. doi:

He, J., Morrison, A. M., & Zhang, H. (2021). How High-Performance HR Practices and LMX Affect Employee Engagement and Creativity in Hospitality. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(8), 1360-1382. doi:10.1177/1096348021996800

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25): Harvard university press.

Huang, X., Xu, E., Huang, L., & Liu, W. (2018). Nonlinear consequences of promotive and prohibitive voice for managers’ responses: The roles of voice frequency and LMX. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(10), 1101-1120. doi:

Johnson, M. E., & Whang, S. (2002). E-BUSINESS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: AN OVERVIEW AND FRAMEWORK*. Production and Operations Management, 11(4), 413-423. doi:

Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L., Zivnuska, S., & Gully, S. M. (2003). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 764–772. doi:

Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Paper presented at the Nebraska symposium on motivation.

Khalili, A. (2018). Creativity and innovation through LMX and personal initiative. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 323-333. doi:10.1108/JOCM-09-2016-0183

Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear:: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163-193. doi:

Klaas, B. S., & DeNisi, A. S. (1989). Managerial reactions to employee dissent: The impact of grievance activity on performance rating. Academy of management journal, 32(4), 705-717. doi:

Lam, W., Huang, X., & Snape, E. (2007). Feedback-seeking behavior and leader-member exchange: Do supervisor-attributed motives matter? Academy of management journal, 50(2), 348-363. doi:

LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868. doi:

LI, F., & ZHONG, X. (2020). The distinction between promotive and prohibitive voice. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(11), 1939-1952. doi:

Liang, H.-L., & Yeh, T.-K. (2020). The effects of employee voice on workplace bullying and job satisfaction. Management decision, 58(3), 569-582. doi:10.1108/MD-01-2019-0112

Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of management journal, 55(1), 71-92. doi:

Liang, J., Shu, R., & Farh, C. I. (2019a). Differential implications of team member promotive and prohibitive voice on innovation performance in research and development project teams: A dialectic perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 91-104.

Liang, J., Shu, R., & Farh, C. I. C. (2019b). Differential implications of team member promotive and prohibitive voice on innovation performance in research and development project teams: A dialectic perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 91-104. doi:

Liao, S., Zhou, X., Guo, Z., & Li, Z. (2019). How does leader narcissism influence employee voice: The attribution of leader impression management and leader-member exchange. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(10), 1819. doi:

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 662-674. doi:

Liu, R., Chen, X., & Wen, X. (2020, 4-8 May 2020). Voice Conversion with Transformer Network. Paper presented at the ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121. doi:

Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 697-708. doi:

Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: an examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87-112. doi:

McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018). Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4812. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4

Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of management studies, 40(6), 1453-1476. doi:

Morrison, E. W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of management journal, 36(3), 557-589. doi:

Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197. doi:

Morrison, E. W., & Bies, R. J. (1991). Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: A literaturereview and research agenda. Academy of Management review, 16(3), 522-541. doi:

Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 706-725. doi:

Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(6), 852-863. doi:

Mulligan, R., Ramos, J., Martín, P., & Zornoza, A. (2021). Inspiriting innovation: The effects of leader-member exchange (LMX) on innovative behavior as mediated by mindfulness and work engagement. Sustainability, 13(10), 5409. doi:

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2010). Growth modeling with latent variables using Mplus: Introductory and intermediate growth models. Mplus Short Course Topic, 3.

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1995). Effective-whistle blowing. Academy of Management review, 20(3), 679-708. doi:

Ng, S. B., Buckingham, K. J., Lee, C., Bigham, A. W., Tabor, H. K., Dent, K. M., . . . Bamshad, M. J. (2010). Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder. Nature Genetics, 42(1), 30-35. doi:10.1038/ng.499

Premru, M., Černe, M., & Batistič, S. (2022). The Road to the Future: A Multi-Technique Bibliometric Review and Development Projections of the Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Research. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221097688. doi:10.1177/21582440221097688

Rosen, J. M., & Jordan, C. T. (2009). The increasing complexity of the cancer stem cell paradigm. science, 324(5935), 1670-1673. doi:

Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating Statistical Power and Required Sample Sizes for Organizational Research Using Multilevel Modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 347-367. doi:10.1177/1094428107308906

Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Song, J., Gu, J., Wu, J., & Xu, S. (2019). Differential promotive voice–prohibitive voice relationships with employee performance: Power distance orientation as a moderator. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(4), 1053-1077. doi:10.1007/s10490-019-09644-6

Soomro, B. A., Memon, M., & Shah, N. (2021). Paternalistic leadership style, employee voice and creativity among entrepreneurs: empirical evidence from SMEs of a developing country. Management decision, 59(2), 285-305. doi:10.1108/MD-11-2018-1207

Thomas, K. W., & Pondy, L. R. (1977). Toward an "Intent" Model of Conflict Management Among Principal Parties. Human Relations, 30(12), 1089-1102. doi:10.1177/001872677703001203

Urbach, T., & Fay, D. (2021). Leader Member Exchange in Leaders’ Support for Voice: Good Relationships Matter in Situations of Power Threat. Applied Psychology, 70(2), 674-708. doi:

van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 38-53. doi:

Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., & Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological Ownership: An Empirical Examination of its Consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226. doi:10.1177/1059601195202008

Venkataramani, V., & Tangirala, S. (2010). When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 582-591. doi:

Vila-Vázquez, G., Castro-Casal, C., & Álvarez-Pérez, D. (2020). From LMX to individual creativity: Interactive effect of engagement and job complexity. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(8), 1-18. doi:

Wang, C.-C., Hsieh, H.-H., & Wang, Y.-D. (2020). Abusive supervision and employee engagement and satisfaction: the mediating role of employee silence. Personnel Review, 49(9), 1845-1858. doi:10.1108/PR-04-2019-0147

Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of management journal, 38(1), 232-260. doi:

Weiss, M., Weiss, D., & Zacher, H. (2022). All set in stone? How essentialist beliefs about aging affect older workers' motivation to continue working beyond retirement age. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(8), 1446-1461. doi:

Wellman, N., Mayer, D. M., Ong, M., & DeRue, D. S. (2016). When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(6), 793-814. doi:

Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 125-139. doi:

Wulani, F., Handoko, T. H., & Purwanto, B. M. (2022). Supervisor-directed OCB and deviant behaviors: the role of LMX and impression management motives. Personnel Review, 51(4), 1410-1426. doi:10.1108/PR-06-2020-0406

Xie, Z., Wu, N., Yue, T., Jie, J., Hou, G., & Fu, A. (2020). How Leader-Member Exchange Affects Creative Performance: An Examination From the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573793

Zare, M., & Flinchbaugh, C. (2019). Voice, creativity, and big five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 32(1), 30-51.

Zhang, P., Jiang, M., Adeel, A., & Yaseen, A. (2018). The Effects of Social Relationships and the Justice Environment on Creative Idea Endorsement. IEEE Access, 6, 44340-44350.

Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of management journal, 44(4), 682-696.

Zhou, J., Oldham, G. R., Chuang, A., & Hsu, R. S. (2022). Enhancing employee creativity: Effects of choice, rewards and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107, 503-513.


Israr Ahmad (Primary Contact)
Ramayah Thurasamy
Ahmad Adeel
Bushra Alam
Author Biographies

Israr Ahmad, School of Managememt, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang Malaysia

Dr. Israr Ahmad: Currently, he is serving as a Post-Doctoral Fellow at the School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia. He received his doctorate in management from Universiti Utara Malaysia. A seasoned professional and dedicated academician, he excels in both fields. His area of interest includes management, strategic management, business studies, organizational behavior, human capital, and organizational development. His research and teaching endeavors have left a positive impact on both students and colleagues alike. He is a motivated and diligent man who would relish the opportunity to exhibit his worth in a challenging setting. He continues to contribute significantly to academia and research.

Ramayah Thurasamy, School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia

Ramayah, is currently a Professor of Technology Management, School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Visiting ProfessorMinjiang University (China), Daffodil International University (DIU) Bangladesh, Fakulti Ekonomi dan Pengurusan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Faculty of Economics and  Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Fakulti Pengurusan dan Perniagaan, Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) and Adjunct Professorat University Center for Research & Development (UCRD), Chandigarh University (CU), India, Sunway University, Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR) and Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Malaysia. He was also a Visiting Professor at King Saud University (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) and an Adjunct Professor at Multimedia University previously. He has an h-index of 111 and a citation of 48,229 in Google Scholar and an i-10 index of 527; his h-index in SCOPUS is 64, with 14,840 citations, while his h-index in ISI/Clarivate is 50 with 9,979 citations. His full profile can be accessed from 

Ahmad Adeel, Department of Business Education, The University of Chenab, Pakistan

Ahmad (Given Name) Adeel (Family Name) is an associate professor of Management at the Department of Business Education, The University of Chenab, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan. He received his PhD in Business Administration from Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. His research interests are conflict management, motivation, and creativity.

Ahmad, I., Thurasamy, R., Adeel, A., & Alam, B. (2023). Promotive Voice, Leader-member Exchange, and Creativity Endorsement: The Role of Supervisor-Attributed Motives. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(3), 1–13.

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_