A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Communication Apprehension A Comparison of Three European Nations

Stephen M. Croucher (1) , Mélodine Sommier (2) , Diyako Rahmani (3) , Juliane Appenrodt (4)
(1) Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä , Finland
(2) Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä , Finland
(3) Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä , Finland
(4) Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä , Finland

Abstract

Data from England, Finland, and Germany were used to explore national differences in communication apprehension (CA). Based on the traditions of oral communication training in each nation, and the history of cross-cultural comparisons in CA, it was proposed that national differences would emerge. English participants scored lower than Finnish and German participants on totalCA, publicCA, dyadicCA, and meetingCA; Finnish participants scored higher than all nations on totalCA, dyadicCA, and meetingCA; and German participants consistently scored in the middle on all aspects of CA, except for publicCA. The study of oral communication, conversational style, and politeness are discussed as potential variables relating to CA differences between the nations.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Allen, M. & Bourhis, J. (1996). The relationship of communication apprehension to communication behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Quarterly, 44, 214-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379609370011

Allen, J. L., O'Mara, J., & Long, K. M. (2014). The influence of communication traits and culture on perceptions of distance in intracultural and intercultural relationships in the United States. China Media Research, 10, 72–88.

Andrew, J. (1996). Popular culture and public debate: London 1780. The Historical Journal, 39, 405-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00020306

Beatty, M. J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Interpersonal communication as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and Personality: Trait perspectives (pp. 41-67). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376448

Byrne, P. R. (1987). Foreign language communication apprehension of Germans learning English: An East-West comparison. Unpublished master’s thesis. Texas Tech University: Lubbock, TX.

Byrnes, H. (1986). Interactional style in German and American conversations. Text, 6, 189-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.2.189

Carbaugh, D. A. (2005). Cultures in conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cupach, W. R., & Metts, S. (1994). Facework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326986

Deutscher Bildungsserver. (n.d.). Bildungspläne/Lehrpläne der Bundesländer für allgeminbildende Schulen. Die Lehrphlan Datenbank. Retrieved November 15, 2012 from: http://www.bildungsserver.de/Bildungsplaene-Lehrplaene- der-Bundeslaender-fuer-allgemeinbildende-Schulen-400.html

Donovan, L. A., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2004). Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 21, 420- 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090409360006

Dwyer, K. K. (2000). The multidimensional model: Teaching students to self- manage high communication apprehension by self-selecting treatments. Communication Education, 49, 72-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379194

Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen. (n.d.). Seminar für allgemeine Rhetorik. Retrieved November 15, 2012 from: http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/uni/nas/English Speaking Union. (n.d.). Schools’ programmes. Retrieved November 13, 2012 from: http://www.esu.org/programmes/schools

Finnish National Board of Education. (2004). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Retrieved November 12 from: www.oph/fi/english/education/basic_education

Gudykunst, W. B. (2002). Issues in cross-cultural communication research. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 165-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hackman, M. Z., & Barthel-Hackman, T. A. (1993). Communication apprehension, willingness to communicate, and sense of humor: United States and New Zealand perspectives. Communication Quarterly, 41, 282-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369889

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Hassall, T., Joyce, J., Ottewill, R., Arquero, J., & Donoso, J. (2000). Communication apprehension in UK and Spanish business and accounting students. Education & Training, 42(2), 93-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005351

Heisel, A. D., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1999). Testing theoretical relationships and non-relationships of genetically-based predictors: Getting started with communibiology. Communication Research Reports, 16, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099909388695

Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. H., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-cultural Research, 38, 52- 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443

House, J. (2005). Politeness in Germany- Politeness in Germany? In: L. Hickey & M. Stewart (Eds.), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 2005, 13-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597398-003

Hsu, C-F. (2004). Sources of differences in communication apprehension between Taiwanese and Americans. Communication Quarterly, 55, 370-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370207

Hsu, C.-F (2007). A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between Americans and Taiwanese. Communication Quarterly, 55, 359– 374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701497831

Hsu, C-F. (2010). Acculturation and communication traits: A study of cross- cultural adaptation among Chinese in America. Communication Monographs, 77, 414-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.499367

Iivonen, M., Sonnenwald, D.H., Parma, M., & Poole-Kober, E. (1998). Analyzing and understanding cultural differences: Experiences from education in library and information studies. Paper presented at the 64:th IFLA General Conference.

Johnson, D. I. (2007). Politeness theory and conversational refusals: Associations between various types of face threat and perceived competence. Western Journal of Communication, 71, 196-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310701518427

Johnson, D. I., Roloff, M. E., & Riffee, M. A. (2004). Politeness theory and refusals of requests: Face threat as a function of expressed obstacles. Communication Studies, 55, 227-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970409388616

Kelly, L., & Keaten, J. A. (2000). Testing communication anxiety: Implications of the communibiological paradigm. Communication Education, 49, 45-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379192

Kurki, L., & Tomperi, T. (2011). Väittely opetusmenetelmänä. Kriittisen ajattelun, argumentation ja retoriikan taidot käytännössä. Tampere, Finland: Europaalaisen filosofian seura ry.

Lakey, S. G., & Canary, D. J. (2002). Actor goal achievement and sensitivity to partner as critical factors in understanding interpersonal communication competence and conflict strategies. Communication Monographs, 69, 217-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750216542

Lu, Y., & Hsu, C-F. (2008). Willingness to communicate in intercultural interactions between Chinese and Americans. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 75-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750802533356

Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2009). A reexamination of Swedish and American college students’ communicative attributes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 38, 9-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750903381622

McCroskey, J. C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00599.x

McCroskey, J. C. (1984). An introduction to rhetorical communication (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McCroskey, J. C., Burroughs, N. F., Daun, A., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Correlates of quietness: Swedish and American perspectives. Communication Quarterly, 38, 127-137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379009369749

McCroskey, J. C., Gudykunst, W. B., & Nishida, T. (1985). Communication apprehension among Japanese students in native and second language. Communication Research Reports, 2, 11-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17464099.1985.12289912

Merkin, R. S. (2009). Cross-Cultural differences in approach-avoidance communication in South Korea and the US. Human Communication, 12, 199-213.

Motley, M. T. (1995). Overcoming your fear of public speaking: A proven method. New York, NY: McGraw Hill College Custom Series.

Neuliep, J. W., Chadouir, M., & McCroskey, J. C. (2003). A cross-cultural test of the association between temperament and communication apprehension. Communication Research Reports, 20, 320-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388831

Nishimura, S., Nevgi, A., & Tella, S. (2008). Communication style and cultural features in nigh/low context communication cultures: A case study of Finland, Japan and India. Teoksessa A. Kallioniemi (toim.), Uudistuva ja kehittyvä ainedidaktiikka. Ainedidaktinen symposiumi 8.2.2008 Helsingissä. Osa 2 (ss. 783–796). [In Kallioniemi, A. (Ed.), Renovating and developing subject didactics. Proceedings of a subject-didactic symposium in Helsinki on Feb. 2, 2008. Part 2 (pp. 783–796). Helsinki, Finland. University of Helsinki. Department of Applied Sciences of Education. Research Report 299].

Novin, A. M., & Tucker, J. M. (1993). The composition of 150-hour accounting programs: An empirical investigation. Issues in Accounting Education, 8, 273-291.

Nuorkauppakamari. (2012). Debatin SM-Kilpailut. Retrieved November 12, 2012 from: http://www.debatti.fi

Pederson, J., Tkachuk, H., & Allen, M. (2008). How perceived situational frequency and situational importance affect communication apprehension: A cross cultural analysis. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 189–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750903135374

Pörhöla, M. (1997). Trait anxiety, experience, and the public speaking state responses of Finnish university students. Communication Research Reports, 14, 367-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099709388680

Pryor, B., Bulter, J., & Boehringer, K. (2005). Communication apprehension and cultural context: A comparison of communication apprehension in Japanese and American students. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 247-252.

Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., McCroskey, L. L., & Fayer, J. M. (2008). Communication traits in first and second language: Puerto Rico. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37, 65-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750802533331

Robinson, T. E. (1997). Communication apprehension and the basic public speaking course: A national survey of in class treatment techniques. Communication Education, 46, 188- 197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379090

Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, introversion, and self-reported communication competence: Finnish and American comparisons. Communication Research Reports, 8, 55-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099109359876

Schleef, E. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1104-1124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002

Teven, J. J., Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (2010). Updating relationships between communication traits and communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 27, 263-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2010.496331

Valjakka, M. (2007). Is modesty attractive? Study of the present and future states of the entrepreneurial skills of Finnish small and medium-sized entrepreneurs. In Dowling, J. & Schmude, J. (Eds.). Empirical entrepreneurship in Europe. New perspectives. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. 135-154

Verband der Debattierclubs an Hochschulen (VDCH). (2012). Warum debattieren? Retrieved November 15, 2012 from: http://www.vdch.de/debattieren

Authors

Stephen M. Croucher
(Primary Contact)
Mélodine Sommier
Diyako Rahmani
Juliane Appenrodt
Author Biographies

Stephen M. Croucher, Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä

Stephen M. Croucher (Ph.D., University of Oklahoma, 2006) is a Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Jyväskylä.

Mélodine Sommier, Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä

Mélodine Sommier (MA, University of Jyväskylä, 2012) is a Doctoral student in the Department of Communication.

Diyako Rahmani, Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä

Diyako Rahmani is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Communication at the University of Jyväskylä.

Juliane Appenrodt, Department of Communication, University of Jyväskylä

Juliane Appenrodt (MA, University of Jyväskylä, 2013) is a working professional in Germany.

Croucher, S. M., Sommier, M., Rahmani, D., & Appenrodt, J. (2015). A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Communication Apprehension A Comparison of Three European Nations. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 15(2), 1–09. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v15i2.693

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_

Most read articles by the same author(s)