Science Education and Culture: Inquiry-Based Learning

Dashia Magee (1), A.J. Meier (2)
(1) The College of New Jersey & University of Northern Iowa - USA, United States,
(2) The College of New Jersey & University of Northern Iowa - USA, United States


At a time when inquiry-based science education is finding increased acceptance, US classrooms are exhibiting a significant increase in diversity. This necessitates attention to the compatibility between the culture of inquiry teaching and the broad range of cultures that form students’ backgrounds. Although some research has considered students’ cultural backgrounds and the roles these might play in the effectiveness of an inquiry approach, none has focused on the specific characteristics of an inquiry approach that might constitute cultural "biases" for a broad range of students with a concomitant broad range of cultural values and beliefs. This article seeks to identify characteristics of an inquiry approach, compare these to the potential cultures students may bring with them to the classroom, using cultural orientations as a heuristic, and suggest construals of inquiry that could better address the needs of a greater number of learners.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Abd-El-Khlalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H-L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Culture and Comparative Studies, 397-419. DOI:

Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (1998). Collaborative inquiry in science, math, and technology. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52. DOI:

Aikenhead, G., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269-287. DOI:<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching. What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. DOI:

Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.). (1993). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Barba, R. H. (1993). A study of culturally syntonic variables in the bilingual/bicultural science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1053-1071. DOI:

Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). Lessons learned: How collaboration helped middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 539-551. DOI:

Brown, G. (1990). Cultural values: The interpretation of discourse. ELT Journal, 44(1), 11-17. DOI:

Colburn A. (2000, March). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 42-44.

Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937. DOI:<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2

Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science: An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 237-258. DOI:<237::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-6

DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Diaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (2006). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook: A complete K-12 reference guide (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Ebsworth, T., & Ebsworth, M. E. (1997). Island Puerto Rican and Continental American responses to critical incidents: An intercultural study of language, norms, and values. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(3), 193-233. DOI:

Etheredge, S., & Rudnitsky, A. (2003). Introducing students to scientific inquiry: How do we know what we know? Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Fox, B. J., Grosso, T., & Tashlik, P. (2004). Inquiry teaching in the sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.

Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (2001). Needed: A framework for integrating standardized and informal assessment for students developing science language proficiency. In J. V. Tinajero & S. Hurley (Eds.), Literacy assessment of bilingual learners (pp. 132-148). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, X. F., & Saxton, M. K. (2001). Promoting science literacy with English language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 417-437. DOI:

Germann, P. J., & Aram, R. J. (1996). Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 773-798. DOI:<773::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-K

Haigh, M., France, B., & Forret, M., (2005). Is ‘doing science’ in New Zealand classrooms an expression of scientific inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 215-226. DOI:

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life. New York: Doubleday.

Hampton, E., & Rodriguez, R. (2001). Inquiry science in bilingual classrooms. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 417-434. DOI:

Hoffman, D. M. (2000). Pedagogies of self in American and Japanese early childhood education: A critical conceptual analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101(2), 193-208. DOI:

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320. DOI:

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

Holliday, A. (2003). Social autonomy: Addressing the dangers of culturalism in TESOL. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 110-126). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. DOI:

Hughes, S., & Lee, C. (2006). At risk students: Learning science through inquiry. Universitas. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from

Huberman, M., & Middlebrooks, S. (2000). The dilution of inquiry: A qualitative study. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 281-304. DOI:

Jacobs, G. M., & Ratmanida (1996). The appropriacy of group activities: Views from some Southeast Asian second language educators. RELC Journal, 27(1), 103-120. DOI:

Julyan, C., & Duckworth, E. (1996). A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning science. In C. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Foundations, perspective, and practice (pp.55-72). New York: Teachers College Press.

Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientation. New York: Row, Peterson.

Koyama, T. (1992). Japan: A handbook in intercultural communication. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3, 4), 313-350. DOI:

Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483-497. DOI:

Ladewski, B. G., Krajcik, J. S., & Harvey, C. L. (1994). A middle grade science teacher’s emerging understanding of project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 499- 515. DOI:

Lee, O. (2003). Equity for linguistically and culturally diverse students in science education: A research agenda. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 465-489. DOI:

Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Literacy skills in science performance among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80, 651-671. DOI:<651::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-I

Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27, 1-10. DOI:

Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (2001). Instructional congruence to promote science learning and literacy development for linguistically diverse students. In D. R. Lavoie & M. W. Roth (Eds.), Models for science teacher preparation: Bridging the gap between research and practice (pp. 109-126). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI:

Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Boon, R., & Carter, K. B. (2001). Correlates of inquiry learning in science: Constructing concepts of density and buoyancy. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3), 130-137. DOI:

McCargar, D. F. (1993). Teacher and student role expectations: Cross-cultural differences and implications. The Modern Language Journal, 77 (2), 192-207. DOI:

McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (1993). New visions of teaching. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 1-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McNary, S. J., Glasgow, N. A., & Hicks, C. D. (2005). What successful teachers do in inclusive classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). "Maestro, what is ‘quality’?": Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469-498. DOI:

National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Science Foundation (1998). Infusing equity in systematic reform: An implementation scheme. Washington D.C.

Ogunniyi, M. B. (1988). Adapting western science to traditional African culture. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 1-9. DOI:

Palinscar, A. S., Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 643-658. DOI:

Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224-250. DOI:

Powell, G., & Caseau, D. (2004). Classroom communication and diversity: Enhancing instructional practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI:

Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858. DOI:<839::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-X

Rodríguez, A. J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council’s national science education standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 19-38. DOI:<19::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-R

Rop, C. J. (2003). Spontaneous inquiry questions in high school chemistry classrooms: Perceptions of a group of motivated learners. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 13-33. DOI:

Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI:

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 177-199. DOI:

Scott, C. A. (1994). Project-based science: Reflections of a middle school teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 95(1), 75-94. DOI:

Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Teacher Education, 88(4), 610-645. DOI:

Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859-882. DOI:

Stewart, E. C., & Bennett, M. J. (1991). American cultural patterns. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Ting-Toomey, S. (2000). Managing intercultural conflicts effectively. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication (9th ed., pp. 388-400). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. DOI:

Tomsho, R. (2006). What’s the right formula? Wall Street Journal, January 19.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). The condition of education 2005. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552. DOI:

Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics. Science Education, 75(1), 9-21. DOI:

Yerrick, R. (2000). Lower track science students’ argumentation and open inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 807-838. DOI:<807::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-7


Dashia Magee (Primary Contact)
A.J. Meier
Author Biographies

Dashia Magee, The College of New Jersey & University of Northern Iowa - USA

Dashia Magee is an assistant professor in the Educational Administration and Secondary Education at the College of New Jersey. She has published in areas of teacher education and science education. She has taught course in science education, curriculum studies, and social foundations.

A.J. Meier, The College of New Jersey & University of Northern Iowa - USA

A.J. Meier is a professor in the MA TESOL/Applied Linguistics Program at the University of Northern Iowa. She has published in the areas of politeness theory, cross-cultural apologies, language and gender, intercultural pragmatics, and language teacher education. She has taught theoretical and applied linguistics and presented intercultural communication workshops in the United States, Russia, and Austria.

Magee, D., & Meier, A. (2011). Science Education and Culture: Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 11(3), 1–14.

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_