Business Communication of a Persuasive Nature - Style Adaptation and Effectiveness during Intercultural Interactions

Elena Pruvli (1)
(1) Estonian Business School, Estonia


Researchers have demonstrated that there are preferred cultural persuasive styles but little empirical research has examined the strategies for adapting persuasive styles in intercultural business interactions. This qualitative study investigates preferred persuasive styles, perceptions of alternative persuasive styles and adaptation strategies among Estonian local municipal managers. This article creates a new path for an explanatory study using a stratified sample by integrating differences in persuasive styles and effective communication theories. The findings introduce how alternative persuasive styles are perceived and how managers adapt to them. The paper offers solutions for adaptation strategies leading to more effective intercultural communication.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Allik, J. et al (2010). ‘How people see others is different from how people see themselves: a replicable pattern across cultures’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (5), 870-882. DOI:

Allwood, J., Nivre, J. and Ahlsén, E. (1993).‘On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Linguistic Feedback’. Journal of Semantics, 9 (1), 1-30. DOI:

Arbnor, I. and Bjerke, B. (2009). Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge, 3:rd ed. California: Sage. DOI:

Adler, N. and Gundersen, A. (2008). International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. 5:thed., Mason, Ohio: Thomson-South-Western-

Aaker, J. and Maheswaran, D. (1997). ‘The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion’. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (3), 315-328. DOI:

Arasaratnam, L. (2007). ‘Research in intercultural communication competence.’ Journal of International Communication, 13 (2), 66–73. DOI:

Appelbaum, R. and Anatol, K. (1974). Strategies for Persuasive Communication. Ohio: A Bell and Howell, Co.

Barnlund, D. (2008). ‘A transactional model of communication,’ in Mortensen C. (Eds.), Communication theory, 2:nded. 47-57. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction. DOI:

Berlo, D.(1960). The process of communication. New York, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Berlo, D., Lemert, J., and Mertz, R. (1969). ‘Dimensions of Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33 (4), 563-576. DOI:

Bernard H. (2012). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chang, C. and Chou, Y. (2008). ‘Goal orientation and comparative valence in persuasion’. Journal of Advertising, 37 (1), 73-87. DOI:

Cooper, D. and Schindler P. (2008). Business research methods, 10:nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cheng, J. (2007). ‘Critical issues in international management research: an agenda for future advancement’. European J. International Management, 1, (1/2), 23–38. DOI:

Craig, R. (1999). ‘Communication Theory as a Field’. Communication Theory, 9 (2), 119-161. DOI:

Craig, R. and Muller, H. (2007). Theorizing communication: Readings across traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Craig, R. (2011). ‘The uses of "argument" in practical meta-discourse’, in Rowland, R. (Ed.), Reasoned argument and social change, 78-86, Washington, DC: National Communication Association.

Department of Statistics (2012). Statistical Yearbook of Estonia [online]Tallinn. (Accessed 25 March 2013)

Garver, E. (1995). Aristotle’s "Rhetoric", Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Glenn, E, Witmeyer, D. and Stevensen, K. (1977). ‘Cultural styles of persuasion’. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1 (3), 52-66. DOI:

Gelfand, M. et al (2011). ‘Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study’. Science, 332 (6033), 1100-1104. DOI:

Gudykunst, W. (1993). ‘Towards a theory of effective interpersonal and intergroup communication: An anxiety/uncertainty management perspective’, in Wiseman, R. and Koester, J. (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence, 33-71, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Gudykunst, W. (1995). ‘Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory: Current status’, in Wiseman, R. (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory, 8-58, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gudykunst, W. and Nishida, T. (2001). ‘Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures’. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 55-72. DOI:

Gudykunst, W. (2003 a). Bridging Differences: Effective Intergroup Communication (Interpersonal Communication Texts), 4:th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI:

Gudykunst, W. (2003b). ‘Understanding Must Precede Criticism: A Response to Yoshitake’s Critique of Anxiety/Uncertainty Management Theory’. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12 (1), 25-40.

Gudykunst, W. (Ed), (2004). Cross-cultural and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gudykunst, W. (2005). ‘An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication: Making the mesh of the net finer’, in Gudykunst W. (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 281–322. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hall, E. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday.

Hall, E. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.

Handwerker, W. (2001). Quick ethnography: A guide to rapid multi-method research .Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

Holstein, J. and Gubrium, J. (Eds), (2012). Varieties of Narrative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI:

Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. K. and Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion, 19-48. New Haven: Yale University Press, CT.

Johnstone, B. (1989). ‘Linguistic Strategies and Cultural Styles for Persuasive Discourse’, in Ting-Toomey, S. and Korzenny, F. (Eds.), Language, Communication, and Culture: Current Directions, 139-156. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis, 2:nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell

Johnstone, B. (2010) Making Pittsburghese: Communication technology, expertise, and the discursive construction of a regional dialect. Language & Communication. (on-line) doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2010.08.010 (Assessed 15. October 2013). DOI:

Lewis, R. (2005). When Cultures Collide: Leading Across Cultures, 3:rd ed., , London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Lee, J.H., Kim H., and Phaal,R. (2012). ‘An analysis of factors improving technology roadmap credibility: A communications theory assessment of road mapping processes’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (2) , 263-280, (Assessed 04 August 2013).

McCRae, R. et al (2007). ‘Climatic Warmth and National Wealth: Some Culture-Level Determinants of National Character Stereotypes’. European Journal of Personality, 21 (8), 953–976. DOI:

Messner, W. and Schäfer, N. (2012). ‘Advancing Competencies for Intercultural Collaboration’, in Bäumer, U., Kreutter, P., and Messner, W. (Eds.) Globalization of Professional Services, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI:

Miller, K. (2005). Communication Theories: Perspectives, processes, and context, 2:nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mortensen, D. (1972). Communication: The Study of Human Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mortensen, D. (2008). (Ed.), Communication theory, 2:nd ed., New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction.

Mõttus, R. et al (2012). ‘The effect of response style on self-reported Conscientiousness across 20 countries’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 (11), 1423-1436. DOI:

Pauleen, D., Rooney, D. and Holden, N. (2010). ‘Practical wisdom and the development of cross-cultural knowledge management: a global leadership perspective’. European J. International Management, 4 (4), 382–395. DOI:

Pruvli, E. and Alas, R. (2012). ‘Multiply cultural mindsets of an international company: Inter-departmental communication’. Paper presented at 28th EGOS Colloquium, 5–7 July 2012.Helsinki, Finland.

Reissman, C.(2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage.

Simintiras, A. and Thomas, A. (1998). ‘Cross-cultural sales negotiations: A literature review and research propositions’. International Marketing Review, 15 (1),10 – 28. DOI:

Simons, H.W. (1976). Persuasion: Understanding, practice and analysis. New York: Random House.

Scollon, R., Scollon, S. and Jones, R. (2012). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (Language in Society. 3:rd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley and Sons.

Schachner, D., Shaver, P. and Mikulincer, M. (2005). ‘Patterns of nonverbal behavior and sensitivity in the context of attachment relationships.’ Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29 (3),141-169. DOI:

Spitzberg, B.(2007). ‘CSRS: The conversational skills rating scale: An instructional assessment of interpersonal competence’. NCA Diagnostic Series, 2:nd ed. Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.

Trenholm, S. and Jensen, A. (2008). Human communication theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

van Zolingen S., Essers C. and Vermeer L. (2012). ‘Cross-cultural training for Dutch expatriates going to India’, European J. of International Management, 6 (1),10 – 28. DOI:

Wetten, D.(1989). ‘What constitutes a theoretical contribution?’ Academy of management review, 14 (4), 490-495. DOI:

Wiseman, R. (2003). ‘Intercultural Communication Competence’, in Gudykunst, W. (Ed.), Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication, 91-208. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wolcott, H. (2008). Ethnography: A way of seeing.2:nd ed.Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

Yoshitake, M. (2002). ‘A critical examination of the anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory as a major intercultural communication theory’. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11 (2),177-193.

Zaman, S. (2008).‘Native among natives’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 37,135-154. DOI:


Elena Pruvli (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Elena Pruvli, Estonian Business School

Elena Pruvli – (a Westminster University, UK graduate), is an international trainer and consultant in intercultural communication. She has designed and performed training workshops for multinationals, governmental institutions, international organisations, academic faculty and entrepreneurs. In the last decade she has conducted intercultural communication courses for European, Indian and Chinese students, and has supervised 50 final master theses on related topics. She is currently a doctorate student and lecturer at Estonian Business School and her research is focused on intercultural communication in a business environment, primarily on the topics of persuasion.

Pruvli, E. (2014). Business Communication of a Persuasive Nature - Style Adaptation and Effectiveness during Intercultural Interactions. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 14(2), 1–18.

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_