Cultural Marginality: Exploration of Self-Esteem and Cross Cultural Adaptation of the Marginalized Individual: An investigation of the second generation Hare Krishnas .
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the cross-cultural adaptation of a sample of adults raised in the Hare Krishna culture. Fifteen second generation ISKCON (International Society for Krishna Consciousness) adults were asked to describe their family, peer, and social interactions and the perceived impact on their cross-cultural adaptation. An analysis of participant responses generated the following fifteen themes: (1) age and context of first contact with mainstream culture, (2) process of cultural adaptation, (3) parents’ marital status, (4) family relationships, (5) layers of marginality, (6) community norms and values, (7) identity crises, (8) self-esteem and self-esteem scores, (9) views of ISKCON culture, (10) views of mainstream culture, (11) cultural vernacular, (12) cultural emblems, (13) role models, (14) current cultural membership, and (15) future family vision. The outcome of the study was discussed with possible clinical issues which included the complexities of cultural belongingness, healthy and self-destructive aspects of adaptation, and feelings of terminal uniqueness.
Full text article
References
Barber, B.K. (1997). Introduction: Adolescent socialization in context-the role of connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 5-11.
Barnes, G. & Farrell, M. (1993). Family systems and social support: A test of the effects of cohesion and adaptability on the functioning of parents and adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 119-132.
Bennett, J.M. (1993). Cultural marginality: Identity issues in intercultural training. In R. Paige (Ed.) Education for the intercultural experience. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
Berry, J.W. (1974). Psychological aspects of cultural pluralism: Unity and identity reconsidered. In R.W. Brislin (Ed.), Topics in culture learning, 17-22. Honolulu, East-West Center.
Berry, J.W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A.M. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models, and some new findings, 9-25. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Berry, J.W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 615-631.
Bhaktivedanta Vedabase (2003). (Version 4.11) [Computer Software]. CA.
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.) Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes, Volume I. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bochner, S. (2003). Culture shock due to contact with unfamiliar cultures. In W.J. Lonner, D.L. Dinnel, S.A. Hayes, & D.N. Sattler (Eds), Online Readings in Psychology and Culture (Unit 8, Chapter 7), (http://www.wwu.edu/~culture), Center for Cross-Cultural Research, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington USA.
Bogt, T., Raijmakers, Q. & Wei, F. (2002). Changes in the parental bond and the well being of adolescents and young adults. Adolescence, 37, 317-333.
Choi, H. (2001). Cultural marginality: A concept analysis with implications for immigrant adolescents. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 24, 193-206.
Cooper, C. (1994). Cultural perspectives on continuity and change in adolescents’ relationships. Advances in Adolescent Development, 6.
Dekovic, M. & Meeus, W. (1995). Identity development, parental, and peer support in adolescence: Results of a national Dutch survey. Adolescence, 30.
Hunsberger, B., Pratt, M., & Prancer, S.M. (2001). Religious Versus Nonreligious Socialization: Does Religious Background Have Implications for Adjustment? The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 105-128.
Jones, C & Shorter-Gooden, K. (2003). Shifting: The Double Lives of Black Women in America. Harper Collins Publishers.
Kim, Y.Y. (1996). Identity Development: From cultural to intercultural. Interaction & Identity, 5, 347-369.
Marcia, J. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558.
Maykut, P. and Morehouse, R. (2001). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: Routledge Falmer.
McCaig, N. (2001). Krsna Culture Kids: Exploring the ISKCON Childhood
Experience. ISKCON Communications Journal, 9.
McCaig, N. (2002). From Simmel’s stranger to the Krishna culture kid: Cultural marginality and the children of Hare Krishna devotees, unpublished research paper.
Nelson, W., Hughes, W., & Honore, M. (1993). The relationship of family structure and family conflict to adjustment in young adult college students. Adolescence, 28.
Park, R.E. (1928). Human Migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 6.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
Rathunde, K. (2001). Family context and the development of undivided interest: A longitudinal study of family support and challenge and adolescents’ quality of experience. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 158-171.
Rochford, E.B. (1985). Hare Krishna in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Revised edition. Middletown, Ct: Wesleyan University Press.
Sartor, C. & Youniss, J. (2002). The relationship between positive parental involvement and identity achievement during adolescence. Adolescence, 37, 221-234.
Schaetti, B. (2000). Global nomad identity development: A review of the literature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Graduate College of the Union Institute, Ann Arbor, MI.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2007 Sachi Horback, Cheryll Rothery-Jackson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.