Crossing Linguistic Bridges: Unravelling the Art of Persuasion Among Albanian Writers in Greek

Alexandra E. Vasilopoulou (1) , George S. Ypsilandis (2)
(1) Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Greece
(2) Department of Italian Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Greece

Abstract

Pragmalinguistic (PML) failure complicates intercultural communication in both productive and receptive modes. This paper attempts to unravel the persuasive strategies used by Albanians writing in Greek and further record the overall suitability score they received when assessed by Greek teachers (n=176). A protocol sample of extracted persuasive strategies was created to be used for further investigation, with respect to their suitability. The evaluation body provided their scores systematically through a purposefully constructed internet evaluation tool, which recorded their responses in a scale format. All strategies used scored below the middle of the evaluation scale and were thus considered unsuitable to be included in a letter of this type. Direct pathos statements were found particularly unfit to be employed in this context, while logos received the highest votes. Significant correlations were found in the voting tactic of the judges, which suggests a personality question in the judgments, while younger judges seemed to be more rigid in their evaluations. On the other hand, inconsistencies were detected between a) the evaluation of ethos and pathos persuasive arguments by these Greek judges and b) the employment of the exact same strategies by Greeks writing in English, outlined in an earlier study. The judges’ level of education and their teaching experience did not correlate statistically with the judgment scores they provided.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Al-Aghbari, K. (2016). Refusal Strategies Among Omani EFL Students. Sage Open, 6(4), 1-10, 215824401667290. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016672907

Alrefaee, Y. (2020). Refusals of suggestions and offers: An interlanguage pragmatic study. The Asian ESP Journal, 16, 176-185. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3621233

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B.S. (1991). Developing pragmatic awareness: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100012122

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B.S. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(03), 279. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100012122

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Vellenga, H.E. (2012). The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System, 40, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.01.004

Derakhshan, A., & Eslami, Z. R. (2020). The effects of metapragmatic awareness, interactive translation, and discussion through video-enhanced input on the Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners' comprehension of implicatures. Applied Research on English Language, 9(1), 637-664. https://doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2019.118062.1476

Farnia, M., Ypsilandis, G., & Ghasempour, B. (2019). Intracultural Iranian Persuasion The Case of Scholarship Application Letters. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 19(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v19i3.788

Foster, P., & Ohta, A.S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami014

Frederick, P. (2012). Persuasive writing: How to harness the power of words. Pearson UK.

Giles, H. (Ed.). (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Giles, H., Taylor, D.M., & Bourhis, R. (1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500000701

Grice, H. P. (1973). Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

Grice, H. P. (1999). Logic and conversation. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The Discourse Reader. London and New York: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (Ed.). (1975). Logic and conversation: Vol. 3. Speech acts. New York: Academic.

Hofstede, G. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Revised and expanded 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

James, C., Scholfield, P., & Ypsiladis, G. (1994). Cross‐cultural correspondence. World Englishes, 13(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1994.tb00319.x

James, C., Scholfield, P.J., & Ypsilandis, G.S. (1992) Communication Failures in Persuasive Writing: Towards a Typology. Yearbook of English Studies. Vol. 3, 1992, (Department of English Studies, Aristotle University) pp. 175-193.

Johnstone, B. (1989). Linguistic strategies and cultural styles for persuasive discourse. In S. Ting Toomey & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Language, Communication and Culture: Current Directions. London: Sage Publications.

Vougiouklis, T., & Kambaki-Vougioukli, P. (2011). On the use of the bar. China-USA Business Review, 10(6), 484-489.

Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. In Culturally Speaking Second Edition. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10125/40802

Kasper, G., & Roever, C. (2005). Pragmatics in second language learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 317-334). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishing.

Katsarou, E., & Kambakis-Vougiouklis, P. (2022). Delving into the use of L2 vocabulary learning strategies by Greek ESP university students and the role of self-esteem. Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics, 24, 460-476. https://doi.org/10.26262/istal.v24i0.9199

Malmir, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). The socio-pragmatic, lexico-grammatical, and cognitive strategies in L2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of Iranian male vs. female EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350934085.ch-014

Miller, G.A. (1974). ‘Psychology, language and levels of communication’ in A. Silverstein (eds.). Human Communication. New York: John Wiley.

Omar, A. S. (1991). How learners greet in Kiswahili. In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning Vol.2 (pp. 59-73). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.

Papadopoulos, I., & Ypsilandis, G. (2017). Towards an understanding of the persuasive profile of teenaged Greek EFL learners. Journal of Applied Languages and Linguistics, 1(1), 61-75.

Psaltou-Joycey, A., & Ypsilandis, G.S. (2000). Contrastive discourse in Greek application letter writing. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Cyprus (University of Cyprus) (pp. 598-604).

Riley, P. (1989). Well, don't blame me! On the interpretation of pragmatic errors. In W. Oleksy (Ed.), Contrastive Pragmatics (pp. 231-249). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.3.15ril

Rose, R. K. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2345-2364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.002

Saleem, T., Anjum, U., & Tahir, S. (2021). The sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic strategies in L2 pragmatic competence: A case of Pakistani ESL learners. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 50(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2021.1877176.

Startz, D. (2019). As more women graduate from college, the teaching profession becomes more female. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/

Taguchi, N. (2013). Teaching pragmatics. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, vol. IX (pp. 5643-5650). Wiley Blackwell.

Taguchi, N. (2019) (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics. Routledge.

Taguchi, N. (2020). Digitally mediated remote learning of pragmatics. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12455

Takahashi, T., & Beebe, L. M. (1987). The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal, 8, 131-155.

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. University of Lancaster. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91

Ypsilandis, G.S. (1994) Logomachia: Pragmatic Failure in Letters of Application In Douka-Kabitoglou, E. (Eds) Logomachia: Forms of Opposition in English Language / Literature. Inaugural Conference Proceedings, Hellenic Association for the Study of English, pp.331-346.

Ypsilandis, G.S. (2023). Variables to consider upon having decided to include pragmatics in the teaching of languages. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 11(1), 16-37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2023-0002

Zhang, Y. B., & Giles, H. (2018). Communication accommodation theory. In Y. Y. Kim (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 95-108). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0156

Authors

Alexandra E. Vasilopoulou
alexandravsl125@yahoo.com (Primary Contact)
George S. Ypsilandis
Author Biographies

Alexandra E. Vasilopoulou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Vasilopoulou Alexandra is a Philologist-Linguist with a particular interest in Discourse Analysis, Corrective Feedback in pragmatic language teaching and the pragmatic aspect of Contrastive Rhetoric.

George S. Ypsilandis, Department of Italian Studies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

George S. Ypsilandis is an ordinary professor of Applied Linguistics interested in the areas of Computer Assisted Language Learning, Supportive Feedback (a term he suggested in 2002) in vocabulary language teaching, Socratic Collaborative Flipped Teaching Approaches, and the pragmatic aspect of Contrastive Rhetoric.

Vasilopoulou, A. E., & Ypsilandis, G. S. (2024). Crossing Linguistic Bridges: Unravelling the Art of Persuasion Among Albanian Writers in Greek. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 24(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v24i2.805

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_
Views
  • Abstract 18
  • Download PDF 4
  • XML 0