Rethinking Intercultural Training In Teacher Training
Abstract
Often lauded for its role in language education, very little is said or written about the integration of intercultural education into language teacher training. This research spotlighted different approaches to interculturality as well as focusing on the processes that pre-service English language teachers went through during their intercultural training. The context of this study was one particular English Teacher Education Department in Turkey. The methodology rested on the use of focus-group interviews. 3 categories and 8 themes emerged from the analysed data indicated the importance of raising pre-service English language teachers’ awareness of different approaches to interculturality, including these approaches in language teacher training as and relating them to pre-service English language teachers’ future practice.
Full text article
References
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36, 391-409.
Coperías Aguilar, M. J. (2010). Intercultural communicative competence as a tool for autonomous learning. Revista canara de estudos ingleses,61, 87-98.
Cooper, H. (1992). The Teaching of History Implementing the National Curriculum. London: Davis Fulton Publishers.
Council of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning teaching assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of Higher Education (2007). Teacher education and education faculties (1982-2007). Ankara: CoHE Publications.
Dervin, F. & Dirba M. (2006). On Liquid Interculturality. Finnish and Latvian student teachers, perceptions of intercultural competence. In Pietilä, P., Lintunen, P. & Järvinen, H.-M. (Eds). Language learners of today (257-273). . Jyväskylä: Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistyksen (AFinLA) julkaisuja.
Dervin, F. (2011). Cultural identity, representation and othering. In Jackdon, J. (ed.) Routledge handbook of intercultural communication, London & NY: Routledge.
Dervin, F., Gajardo, A. & A. Lavanchy (Eds.) (2011). Politics of interculturality. Newcastle: CSP.
Dervin, F. (2012). Sociodigital interaction: renewed ways of ‘doing intercultutaltity?’ In Sharifian, F. & M. Jamari (Eds). Intercultural communication in new era (pp. 83-98). Routledge.
Fer, S. (2004). Qualitative evaluation of emotional intelligence in-service program for secondary school teachers. The Qualitative Report. 9(4), 562-588.
Halualani, R. T. (2011). Invisible dimensions: framing the intercultural communication course through a critical intercultural communication framework. Intercultural Education, 22(1), 43-54.
Holliday, A. (2010). Intercultural communication and ideology. London: Sage.
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lázár, I., Huber-Kriegler, M., Lussier, D., Matei, G., & Peck, C. (Eds.). (2007). Developing and assessing intercultural communicative competence: A guide for language teachers and teacher educators. Graz, Austria: European Centre for Modern Languages/Council of Europe.
Jandt, F. E. (2013). An introduction to intercultural communication: Identities in a global community. (7th ed.) Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications.
Machart, R., Lim, C.B., Lim, S.N. & Yamato, E. (Eds.). (2013). Intersecting identities and interculturality: Discourse and practice. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
McLaren, P. (2001). Teaching against globalization and the new imperialism: Toward a revolutionary pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 136–150.
MoNE. (2013). Primary School English Language Teaching Program. Ankara: National Education Press.
Nieto, S. (2002). Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives for a new century. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Popkewitz, T. S. Critical traditions, modernism and the “posts” (1999). In T. S. Popkewitz & L. Fendler, (Eds.), Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics (pp.1–16). London: Routledge.
Pillar, I. (2011). Intercultural communication: a critical introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Räsänen, R. (2007). Intercultural education as education for global responsibility, In T. Kaivola & M. Melén-Paaso (Eds), Education for global responsibilities – Finnish Perspectives. Publications of the Ministry of Education (pp. 18-30). Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (2002). Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2019 Nilgün Yücel, Aysun Yavuz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.