Global corporate communication and the notion of legitimacy
Abstract
When international companies seek to establish legitimacy, it involves different stakeholders locally and globally. This paper analyses corporate communication in order to trace the discursive construction of the customers, investors, staff and authoritiess from whom legitimacy is sought.
It is argued that the notion of legitimacy hinges on accountability, i.e. on the selection of groups to whom the writers feel responsible. Annual reports from the airline industry are used to test previous results that are based on concepts of Eastern collectivity and Western individuality. It is shown that this distinction is misleading: contrary to expectation, management construes accountability in similar ways vis-à-vis investors; in relation to the staff, the East-West difference runs along unexpected status-related lines.
Full text article
References
Aerts, W. (2005). Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30.6, 493-517.
Aerts, W. and Cormier, D. (2009). Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 34 .1, 1-27.
Amernic, J. and Craig, R. (2009). Understanding accounting through conceptual metaphor. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20.8, 875-883.
Argenti, P.A. and Forman, J. (2002). The power of corporate communication. Crafting the voice and image of your business. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
Boje, D.M. (2001). Corporate writing in the web of Postmodern culture and postindustrial capitalism. Managements Communication Quarterly,14, 508-516.
Boje, D.M. and Rosile, G.A. (2008). Specters of Wal-Mart: A critical discourse analysis of stories of Sam Walton's ghost . Critical Discourse Studies, 5.2, 153 – 179.
Brennan, N.M., Guillamon-Saorin, E. and Pierce, A. (2009). Impression management: Developing and illustrating a scheme of analysis for narrative disclosures – a methodological note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22.5, 789 – 832.
Chang, Y. (2007). An exploration of the standardization of targeting strategies and the use of promotional disciplines on the web. A cross-national study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15.5, 327-343.
Chau, G.K. and Gray, S.J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and in Singapore. International Journal of Accounting, 37, 247-265.
Clatworthy, M.A. and Jones. M.J. (2006). Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman's statement. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19.4, 493 – 511.
Cornelissen, J. (2008). Corporate communications 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
David, C. (2001). Mythmaking in annual reports. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 195-222.
Fombrun, C. J. and van Riel, C.B.M. (2007), Essentials of corporate communication: Implementing practices for effective reputation management. London: Routledge.
Fowler, F., Hodge, B., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge
Frownfelter-Lohrke, C. and Fulkerson, C.L. (2001). The incidence and quality of graphics in annual reports: An international comparison. Journal of Business Communication, 38.3, 337-357
Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G. and Fabbri, T. (2002). Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 622-634
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences : Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage
Hooghiemstra, Reggy (2008). East West differences in attributions for company performance: A content analysis of Japanese and US corporate annual reports. Journal of Cross-cultural Psycholog, 39, 618-629.
Hooghiemstra, R. (forthcoming 2010). Letters to shareholders: A content analysis comparison of letters written by CEOs in the US and Japan. International Journal of Accounting, 45.3.
Hu, J., Shima,K., Oehlmann, R., Zhao, J., Takemura, Y. and Matsemuto, K. (2004). An empirical study of audience impression of B2C web pages in Japan, China and the UK. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 3, 176-189.
Osland, J.S. and Bird, A. 2000. Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. Academy of Management Executive, 14.1, 65-70.
Kitayama, S., Snibbe, A.C., Markus, H.R. and Suzuki, T. (2004). Is there any "free" choice? Self and dissonance in two cultures. Psychological Science, 15.8, 527-33.
Kitayama, S., Matsumoto, H., Markus, H.R. and Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the Self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72.6, 1245-1267.
Kohut, G.F. and Segars, A.H. (1992). The president’s letter to stockholders: An examination of corporate communication strategy. Journal of Business Communication 29.1, 7-21.
Lee, F., Peterson, C. and Tiedens, L.Z. (2004), Mea culpa: Predicting stock prices from organizational attributes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30.12, 1636-49.
Livesey, S.M. (2001). Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria . Journal of Business Communication, 38.1, 58-91.
Merkl-Davies, D.M. and Brennan, N.M. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116-95.
Okazaki. S. (2005). Searching the web for global brands: How American brands standardise their web sites in Europe. European Journal of Marketing, 39. 1-2, 87-109.
Spencer-Oatey, H. and Franklin, P. (2009). Intercultural interaction. A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stohl, Cynthia (2001). Globalizing organizational communication. In eds Jablin, F.M. and Putnam, L.L., The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, 323- 375. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Subramanian, R., Insley, R. and Blackwell, R.D. (1993). Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports. Journal of Business Communication, 30.1, 49- 61.
Ting-Toomey, S. and Oetzel, J.G. (2003). Cross-cultural face concerns and conflict styles: Current status and future directions. In eds. Gudykunst, W.G., Cross-cultural and intercultural communication, 127-147. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tsang, E.W.K. (2002). Self-serving attributions in corporate annual reports: A replicated study. Journal of Management Studies, 39.1, 51-65.
Vanstraelen, A., Zarzeski, M.T. and Robb, S.W.G. (2003). Corporate nonfinancial disclosure practices and financial analyst forecast abilities across three European countries. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 4.3, 249-278.
Verčič , D. (2003). The Public Relations of movers and shakers: Transnational corporations. In eds Sriramesh, K. and Verčič, D. The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research and Practice. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Wexler. M.N. (2009). Strategic ambiguity in emergent coalitions: The triple bottom line. Corporate Communications, 14.1, 62-77
Williams, L.S. (2008).The mission statement. A corporate reporting tool with a past, present and future. Journal of Business Communication, 45.2, 94-119.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2011 Anne Marie Bülow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.