Communication in product development in an alliance setting
Abstract
This paper deals with communication across functional and cultural borders in product development in an alliance context. It shows how the multiple levels of co-ordination in an alliance increase complexity. Product development takes place in meetings in a nexus of meetings. Communication is studied by the use of video. Sequences from such recordings are played back to participants who assist in the interpretation of communicative situations. It was found that participants tend to become myopic in their attributions of implications of behaviour in meetings, which hampers communication efficiency. It is suggested that Complexity Theory provides an explanation and that a solution can be sought in feedback of video sequences and reflection on communication problems.
Full text article
References
Chamberlain, E.H., (1933) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Czarniawska, B., and Sevón, G., (eds.), (1996), Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879735
Cooper, R., (1995), When Lean Enterprises Collide - Competing through Confrontation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Grice, P., (1975/1989), Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hedberg, B., and Jönsson, S., (1978), Designing Semi-Confusing Information Systems for Organizations in Changing Environments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 3, pp 47 - 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(78)90006-5
Jönsson, S., (1998), Relate management accounting research to managerial work! Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.23 (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00018-4
Lam, A.,(1997), Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. Organization Studies. vol. 18, no 6, pp 973 - 996. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800604
Lampel, J. and Mintzberg, H., (1996), Customizing Customization, Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, Fall, pp. 21 - 30.
Latour, B., (1986), The Powers of association. In Law, J. (ed.). Power, action and belief. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Polanyi, M., (1962), Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Porter, M.E., (1980), Competitive Strategy. Techniques for analysing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M.E., (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
Salter, W.E.G., (1960), Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schroder, H., Driver, M., and Streufert, S.C., (1967), Human Information Processing. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Streufert, S.C., (1972), Success and Response Rate in Complex Decision Making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 8, pp 389 - 403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(72)90065-0
Weick, K.E., (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Winch, P., (1958), The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, L., (1953), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Womack, J.P., Jones,D.T. and Roos,D., (1990), The Machine that Changed the World. New York:MacMillan.
Authors
Copyright (c) 1999 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.