Communication in product development in an alliance setting

Sten Jönsson (1) , Anders Edström (2) , Urban Ask (3)
(1) GRI, Gothenburg University, 411 80 Göteborg , Sweden
(2) GRI, Gothenburg University, 411 80 Göteborg , Sweden
(3) CORE, Chalmers University of Technology, Vasaområdet, byggnad 12, 412 96 Göteborg , Sweden


This paper deals with communication across functional and cultural borders in product development in an alliance context. It shows how the multiple levels of co-ordination in an alliance increase complexity. Product development takes place in meetings in a nexus of meetings. Communication is studied by the use of video. Sequences from such recordings are played back to participants who assist in the interpretation of communicative situations. It was found that participants tend to become myopic in their attributions of implications of behaviour in meetings, which hampers communication efficiency. It is suggested that Complexity Theory provides an explanation and that a solution can be sought in feedback of video sequences and reflection on communication problems.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Chamberlain, E.H., (1933) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Czarniawska, B., and Sevón, G., (eds.), (1996), Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI:

Cooper, R., (1995), When Lean Enterprises Collide - Competing through Confrontation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Grice, P., (1975/1989), Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Hedberg, B., and Jönsson, S., (1978), Designing Semi-Confusing Information Systems for Organizations in Changing Environments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 3, pp 47 - 64. DOI:

Jönsson, S., (1998), Relate management accounting research to managerial work! Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol.23 (forthcoming). DOI:

Lam, A.,(1997), Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures. Organization Studies. vol. 18, no 6, pp 973 - 996. DOI:

Lampel, J. and Mintzberg, H., (1996), Customizing Customization, Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, Fall, pp. 21 - 30.

Latour, B., (1986), The Powers of association. In Law, J. (ed.). Power, action and belief. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

Polanyi, M., (1962), Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Porter, M.E., (1980), Competitive Strategy. Techniques for analysing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

Porter, M.E., (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.

Salter, W.E.G., (1960), Productivity and Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schroder, H., Driver, M., and Streufert, S.C., (1967), Human Information Processing. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

Streufert, S.C., (1972), Success and Response Rate in Complex Decision Making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 8, pp 389 - 403. DOI:

Weick, K.E., (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Winch, P., (1958), The Idea of Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.

Wittgenstein, L., (1953), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Womack, J.P., Jones,D.T. and Roos,D., (1990), The Machine that Changed the World. New York:MacMillan.


Sten Jönsson (Primary Contact)
Anders Edström
Urban Ask
Jönsson, S., Edström, A., & Ask, U. (1999). Communication in product development in an alliance setting. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 1(1), 1–15.

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_