Prejudice toward American Muslims: An Integrated Threat Analysis

Stephen M. Croucher (1) , Dini Homsey (2) , Erin Brusch (3) , Christine Buyce (4) , Shirley DeSilva (5) , Aretha Thompson (6)
(1) Department of Communication at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland. , Finland
(2) College of Business at the University of Central Oklahoma , Finland
(3) Marist College , Finland
(4) Marist College , Finland
(5) Marist College , Finland
(6) Marist College , Finland


This study explores prejudice toward American Muslims. Prejudice is conceptualized using Stephan and Stephan’s integrated threat theory (ITT). ITT identifies four kinds of threat that can lead to prejudice: realistic threats, symbolic threats, stereotypes, and intergroup anxiety. Data were gathered in the United States (= 281) among self-identified Christians. Findings confirm: 1) a positive correlation between real and symbolic threats, and stereotypes, 2) increased contact with an immigrant group, in this case Muslims, is negatively correlated with perceptions of real and symbolic threat, and 3) levels of prejudice differ based on level of education. Theoretical and practical implications of the relationship between prejudice, interpersonal contact/communication, and education are discussed.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Abbas, T. (2007). Muslim minorities in Britain: Integration, multiculturalism and radicalism in the post-7/7 period. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 28, 287-300. DOI:

Abdo, G. (2005). Islam in America: Separate but unequal. The Washington Quarterly, 28, 7-17. DOI:

Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,23, 191-196. DOI:

Bonilla-Silva, E., & Forman, T. A. (2000). "I'm not a racist but…" mapping White college students' racial ideology in the USA. Discourse & Society, 11, 50-85. DOI:

Cant, M. A., & Johnstone, R. A. (2009). How threats influence the evolutionary resolution of within-group conflict. The American Naturalist, 173, 759-771. DOI:

Croucher, S. M. (2008). Looking beyond the hijab. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Croucher, S. M. (2009). How limiting linguistic Freedoms influences the cultural adaptation process: An analysis of the French-Muslim population. Communication Quarterly, 57, 1-17. DOI:

Croucher, S. M., & Cronn-Mills, D. (2011). Religious misperceptions: The case of Muslims and Christians in France and Britain. New York: Hampton Press.

Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.

Gonzàlez, K. V., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J., & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 667-685. DOI:

Kim, Y. Y. (1977). Communication patterns of foreign immigrants in the process of acculturation. Human Communication Research, 4, 66-77. DOI:

Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI:

Kimmel, P. R. (2006). Culture and conflict. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C.

Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

McLaren, L. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81, 909-936. DOI:

Oetzel, J. (1998). The effects of self-construals and ethnicity on self-reported conflict styles. Communication Reports, 11, 133-144. DOI:

Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W., (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75. DOI:

Scroggins, D. (2005, June 27). The Dutch Muslim cultural war. Nation, 21-25.

Shammas, D. S. (2009). Post-9/11 Arab and Muslim American community college students: Ethno-religious enclaves and perceived discrimination. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 283-308. DOI:

Sniderman, P. M., & Hagendoorn, L. (2007). When ways of life collide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1993). Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.) Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception, (pp. 111-136). Orlando: Academic Press. DOI:

Stephan, W. G., and Stephan, C. W. (1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 409-426. DOI:

Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants: An integrated threat theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 559-576. DOI:

Tausch, N., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., & Cairns, E. (2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541-556. DOI:

Verkuyten, M. (1997). The structure of ethnic attitudes: The effect of target group, region, gender and national identity. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 261-284.


Stephen M. Croucher (Primary Contact)
Dini Homsey
Erin Brusch
Christine Buyce
Shirley DeSilva
Aretha Thompson
Author Biographies

Stephen M. Croucher , Department of Communication at the University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

Stephen M. Croucher (Ph.D., University of Oklahoma, 2006) is a professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Jyväskylä in Finland.

Dini Homsey, College of Business at the University of Central Oklahoma

  1. Dini Homsey (PhD, University of Oklahoma) is an Instructor in the College of Business at the University of Central Oklahoma.
Croucher , S. M., Homsey, D., Brusch, E., Buyce, C., DeSilva, S., & Thompson, A. (2013). Prejudice toward American Muslims: An Integrated Threat Analysis. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 1–08.

Article Details

Smart Citations via scite_