Unveiling Discursive Strategies and Ideologies: A Critical Analysis of Migration Discourse in Turkish Newspapers
Abstract
The portrayal of migrants in the media is frequently shaped by a variety of discursive strategies aimed at influencing public perception. This study examines the discursive strategies employed by two prominent Turkish newspapers, Daily Sabah and Duvar, and the underlying ideologies that drive the selection and utilization of such strategies. The theoretical framework guiding this study draws upon Reisigl’s (2017) model, providing a structured approach to data analysis. The findings reveal that Daily Sabah strategically employs a spectrum of discursive strategies, including nomination, perspectivization, argumentation, intensification, predication, and mitigation. Conversely, Duvar predominantly utilizes prediction, mitigation, intensification, and argumentation in their portrayal of migrants. The analysis highlights instances where both newspapers employ multiple discursive strategies within the same news discourse, underscoring the nuanced nature of media construction of discourses on migration. Crucially, the study discerns that the discursive strategies employed by the two newspapers serve distinct purposes and are underpinned by different ideologies. This nuanced exploration sheds light on the intricate relationship between media representation, discursive strategies, and ideological frameworks in shaping public perceptions of migration.
Full text article
References
Ana, O. S. (1999). "Like an animal I was treated": Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 191-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002004
Anderson, B., & Blinder, S. (2019). Who counts as a migrant? Definitions and their consequences. Oxford: Migration Observatory.
Bel-Air, F. (2016). Migration profile: Jordan.
Blommaert, J. (2001). Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers' stories in Belgium. Discourse & Society, 12(4), 413-449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004002
Boukli, E. (2009). Human trafficking in Greece: Media and legal constructions. Paper presented at the PhD Symposium on Contemporary Greece, Hellenic Observatory LSE, June 25.
Clyne, M. (2005). The use of exclusionary language to manipulate opinion. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 173-196. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.03cly
Flowerdew, J., Li, D., & Tran, S. (2002). Discriminatory news discourse: Some Hong Kong data. Discourse & Society, 13(3), 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003052
Flynn, A. R. (2011). Constructing categories, imagining a nation: A critical qualitative analysis of Canadian immigration discourse (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Western Ontario.
Gemi, E., Ulasiuk, I., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2013). Migrants and media newsmaking practices. Journalism Practice, 7(3), 266-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.740248
Geschke, D., Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., & Funke, F. (2010). Majority members' acculturation goals as predictors and effects of attitudes and behaviours towards migrants. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X470544
Içduygu, A. (2003). Irregular migration in Turkey. IOM Migration Research Series. https://doi.org/10.18356/3d51ad40-en
Jacomella, G. (2010). Media and migrations: Press narrative and country politics in three European countries. Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper, University of Oxford.
Jaeger, F. N., Hossain, M., Kiss, L., & Zimmerman, C. (2012). The health of migrant children in Switzerland. International journal of public health, 57, 659-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0375-8
Jurat, A. Y. (2023). The tragedy of irregular migration: The case of Afghans in Turkey. Central Asian Survey, 42(2), 274-292. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X470544
Malcolm, I. G., & Sharifian, F. (2002). Aspects of Aboriginal English oral discourse: An application of cultural schema theory. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X470544
Reisigl, M. (2017). The discourse-historical approach. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis and politics. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 52-61). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-4
Rybina, K., Patni, A., & Schill, A. (2014). Analysing the migration time of live migration of multiple virtual machines. Closer, 14(2), 590-597. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X470544
Silverstone, R., & Georgiou, M. (2005). Editorial introduction: Media and minorities in multicultural Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(3), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830500058943
Martin, P. L., & Sirkeci, I. (2016). Turkish Migration Conference and Migration Challenge. Migration Letters, 13(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v13i1.271
Spoonley, P., & Butcher, A. (2009). Reporting super-diversity: The mass media and immigration in New Zealand. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 30(4), 355-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07256860903213638
Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001002
Thorbjørnsrud, K. (2015). Framing irregular immigration in Western media. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(7), 771-782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215573255
Tileaga, C. (2005). Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies. Discourse & Society, 16(5), 603-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505054938
Triandafyllidou, A. (2000). Racists? Us? Are you joking? The discourse of social exclusion of immigrants in Greece and Italy. In R. King, G. Lazaridis, & C. Tsardanidis (Eds.), Eldorado or fortress? Migration in southern Europe (pp. 186-205). London: Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333982525_9
Türkmen, E. R. (2020). The analysis of Turkey as a non-Western and emerging humanitarian actor (Doctoral dissertation, Bilkent University).
United Nations. (2021). Refugees and migrants: Definition. United Nations. Retrieved from https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/definitions (accessed 15 September, 2023)
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). The mass media today: Discourses of domination or diversity. Javnost/The Public, 2(2), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.1995.11008592
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). New(s) racism: A discourse analytical approach. In Cottle, S. (Ed.), Ethnic minorities and the media (pp. 33-49). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326184
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Columbia University Press.
Yigit, S. (2023). Multi-dimensional understandings of migration: Threats or opportunities. In V. Vinaya & J. M. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of research on the regulation of the modern global migration and economic crisis (pp. 239-256). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6334-5.ch015
Yu, R. (2023). The representation of refugees and migrants in Turkish online media discourse. Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66775-0_13
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Awham Rashid Mohammed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate and free open access to all its content and is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means readers are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as proper attribution is given. This policy is consistent with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access.